These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36062830)

  • 1. Simulator evaluation of an intersection maneuver assist system with connected and automated vehicle technologies.
    Pradhan AK; Pai G; Jeong H; Bao S
    Ergonomics; 2023 Jul; 66(7):999-1014. PubMed ID: 36062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
    Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidance-oriented advanced curve speed warning system in a connected vehicle environment.
    Wang S; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105801. PubMed ID: 33128990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of augmented reality cues to improve the safety of left-turn maneuvers in a connected environment: A driving simulator study.
    Calvi A; D'Amico F; Ferrante C; Bianchini Ciampoli L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105793. PubMed ID: 33017731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a V2V- and V2I-based collision warning system to improve vehicle interaction at unsignalized intersections.
    Huang Y; Wang Y; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Dec; 83():282-293. PubMed ID: 36481019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
    Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a two-stage auditory warning system for safe driving and eco-driving at signalized intersections: A driving simulation study.
    Zhang Y; Li X; Yu Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106777. PubMed ID: 35901607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
    Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of proposed countermeasures for dilemma zone at signalized intersections based on cellular automata simulations.
    Wu Y; Abdel-Aty M; Ding Y; Jia B; Shi Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():69-78. PubMed ID: 28911878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
    Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and application of connected vehicle technology test platform based on driving simulator: Case study.
    Zhao X; Chen H; Li H; Li X; Chang X; Feng X; Chen Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106330. PubMed ID: 34419652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the connected vehicle environment on tunnel entrance zone.
    Li Z; Xing G; Zhao X; Li H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106145. PubMed ID: 34020757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.
    Li G; Wang Y; Zhu F; Sui X; Wang N; Qu X; Green P
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():219-229. PubMed ID: 31862033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities.
    Hajiseyedjavadi F; Zhang T; Agrawal R; Knodler M; Fisher D; Samuel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():41-52. PubMed ID: 29277384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.