These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3606366)
1. Automated sphygmomanometer in spinal cord injured patients during head-up tilt: an evaluation. Hammond MC; Hinde JD; Rida W Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jul; 68(7):430-3. PubMed ID: 3606366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements]. Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices? Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients. Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A validation of the data obtained with the simultaneous recording of blood pressure and the 24-hour electrocardiogram]. Germanò G; Caparra A; Valentino S; Coia F; Federico L; Santucci A Cardiologia; 1993 Jun; 38(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 8402748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement (Finapres) with intra-arterial pressure during prolonged head-up tilt. Petersen ME; Williams TR; Sutton R Eur Heart J; 1995 Nov; 16(11):1641-54. PubMed ID: 8881861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients. Loubser PG Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Systolic blood pressure at rest and during submaximal and maximal exercise on ergometer bicycle. The value of automatic and auscultatory determination]. Petersen JR; Drabaek H; Mehlsen J; Haedersdal C; Møller ML Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Mar; 155(9):631-5. PubMed ID: 8447031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diurnal and short-term variation of blood pressure: comparison of preeclamptic, chronic hypertensive, and normotensive patients. Sawyer MM; Lipshitz J; Anderson GD; Dilts PV; Halperin L Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Sep; 58(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 7266948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II. Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke. Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist. Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Rossmax (ME 701 series) upper arm device: accuracy assessment in an adult population according to the International and the British Hypertension Society protocols. de Greeff A; Shennan AH Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]