126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3606366)
1. Automated sphygmomanometer in spinal cord injured patients during head-up tilt: an evaluation.
Hammond MC; Hinde JD; Rida W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jul; 68(7):430-3. PubMed ID: 3606366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A validation of the data obtained with the simultaneous recording of blood pressure and the 24-hour electrocardiogram].
Germanò G; Caparra A; Valentino S; Coia F; Federico L; Santucci A
Cardiologia; 1993 Jun; 38(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 8402748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement (Finapres) with intra-arterial pressure during prolonged head-up tilt.
Petersen ME; Williams TR; Sutton R
Eur Heart J; 1995 Nov; 16(11):1641-54. PubMed ID: 8881861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Systolic blood pressure at rest and during submaximal and maximal exercise on ergometer bicycle. The value of automatic and auscultatory determination].
Petersen JR; Drabaek H; Mehlsen J; Haedersdal C; Møller ML
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Mar; 155(9):631-5. PubMed ID: 8447031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diurnal and short-term variation of blood pressure: comparison of preeclamptic, chronic hypertensive, and normotensive patients.
Sawyer MM; Lipshitz J; Anderson GD; Dilts PV; Halperin L
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Sep; 58(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 7266948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Rossmax (ME 701 series) upper arm device: accuracy assessment in an adult population according to the International and the British Hypertension Society protocols.
de Greeff A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
