761 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36064090)
1. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
Lambrechts MJ; Toci GR; Siegel N; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients with radiculopathy have worse baseline disability and greater improvements following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared to patients with myelopathy.
Toci GR; Lambrechts MJ; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 36257530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.
Korsun MK; Shahi P; Shinn DJ; Pajak A; Araghi K; Maayan O; Singh N; Tuma O; Asada T; Singh S; Kim AYE; Mai E; Lu AZ; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):576-582. PubMed ID: 37486867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 37(2):E89-E96. PubMed ID: 37941112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Lambrechts MJ; D'Antonio ND; Karamian BA; Toci GR; Sherman M; Canseco JA; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD
Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1610-1621. PubMed ID: 35568109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.
Louie PK; Varthi AG; Narain AS; Lei V; Bohl DD; Shifflett GD; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 29679730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
