These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36065966)

  • 1. Tailoring the bending pattern of non-uniformly flexible pitching hydrofoils enhances propulsive efficiency.
    Han T; Mivehchi A; Kurt M; Moored KW
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2022 Sep; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 36065966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flipper bone distribution reveals flexible trailing edge in underwater flying marine tetrapods.
    DeBlois MC; Motani R
    J Morphol; 2019 Jun; 280(6):908-924. PubMed ID: 31006912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-propelled swimming of a flexible plunging foil near a solid wall.
    Dai L; He G; Zhang X
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Jul; 11(4):046005. PubMed ID: 27377880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physics-informed scaling laws for the performance of pitching foils in schooling configurations.
    Gungor A; Khalid MSU; Hemmati A
    J R Soc Interface; 2024 Jul; 21(216):20240157. PubMed ID: 39082302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of changing synchronization in propulsive performance of side-by-side pitching foils.
    Gungor A; Hemmati A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Mar; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 33571986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propulsive performance of biologically inspired flapping foils at high Reynolds numbers.
    Techet AH
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Jan; 211(Pt 2):274-9. PubMed ID: 18165255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the noise generation and unsteady performance of combined heaving and pitching foils.
    Wagenhoffer N; Moored KW; Jaworski JW
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2023 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 37187175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Undulatory locomotion of flexible foils as biomimetic models for understanding fish propulsion.
    Shelton RM; Thornycroft PJ; Lauder GV
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Jun; 217(Pt 12):2110-20. PubMed ID: 24625649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow interactions of two- and three-dimensional networked bio-inspired control elements in an in-line arrangement.
    Kurt M; Moored KW
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 May; 13(4):045002. PubMed ID: 29671409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wake symmetry impacts the performance of tandem hydrofoils during in-phase and out-of-phase oscillations differently.
    Gungor A; Hemmati A
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Oct; 102(4-1):043104. PubMed ID: 33212661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsupervised clustering and performance prediction of vortex wakes from bio-inspired propulsors.
    Calvet AG; Dave M; Franck JA
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Jun; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 33984842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional scaling laws of cetacean propulsion characterize the hydrodynamic interplay of flukes' shape and kinematics.
    Ayancik F; Fish FE; Moored KW
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Feb; 17(163):20190655. PubMed ID: 32093541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of non-uniform stiffness on the swimming performance of a passively-flexing, fish-like foil model.
    Lucas KN; Thornycroft PJ; Gemmell BJ; Colin SP; Costello JH; Lauder GV
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 Oct; 10(5):056019. PubMed ID: 26447541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of complex driving motion on propulsion performance of a heaving flexible foil.
    Wang C; Tang H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Dec; 14(1):016011. PubMed ID: 30511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance variation due to stiffness in a tuna-inspired flexible foil model.
    Rosic MN; Thornycroft PJ; Feilich KL; Lucas KN; Lauder GV
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Jan; 12(1):016011. PubMed ID: 28094239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wake and aeroelasticity of a flexible pitching foil.
    D'Adamo J; Collaud M; Sosa R; Godoy-Diana R
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2022 May; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 35523157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish.
    Lauder GV; Flammang B; Alben S
    Integr Comp Biol; 2012 Nov; 52(5):576-87. PubMed ID: 22740513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydrodynamic advantages of in-line schooling.
    Saadat M; Berlinger F; Sheshmani A; Nagpal R; Lauder GV; Haj-Hariri H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 May; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 33513591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of spanwise flexibility on steady and dynamic responses of airfoils vs hydrofoils.
    Chae EJ; Young YL
    Phys Fluids (1994); 2021 Jun; 33(6):067124. PubMed ID: 34267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fin Ray Stiffness and Fin Morphology Control Ribbon-Fin-Based Propulsion.
    Liu H; Taylor B; Curet OM
    Soft Robot; 2017 Jun; 4(2):103-116. PubMed ID: 29182095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.