194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36065985)
1. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.
Yavuz A; Büyükerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 37083917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns cemented on solid abutments.
Stona D; Burnett LH; Mota EG; Spohr AM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Jul; 146(7):501-7. PubMed ID: 26113098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Resistance of Molar Crowns Fabricated with Monolithic All-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Cemented on Titanium Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Dogan DO; Gorler O; Mutaf B; Ozcan M; Eyuboglu GB; Ulgey M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 26618513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Different CAD/CAM Crown Materials on the Fracture of Custom-Made Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments After Artificial Aging.
Elsayed A; Farrag G; Chaar MS; Abdelnabi N; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 30677119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue fracture resistance of titanium and chairside CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments supporting zirconia crowns: An in vitro comparative and finite element analysis study.
Giner S; Bartolomé JF; Gomez-Cogolludo P; Castellote C; Pradíes G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):503.e1-503.e9. PubMed ID: 33243472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of abutment design on fracture resistance of resin-matrix ceramic crowns for dental implant restoration: an in vitro study.
Lin J; Cai P; Zhuo Y; Lin L; Zheng Z
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 37344826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
