BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36066065)

  • 1. Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Ames Mutagenicity Prediction.
    Martínez MJ; Sabando MV; Soto AJ; Roca C; Requena-Triguero C; Campillo NE; Páez JA; Ponzoni I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Dec; 62(24):6342-6351. PubMed ID: 36066065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity.
    Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1248-1254. PubMed ID: 37478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
    Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
    Honma M; Kitazawa A; Cayley A; Williams RV; Barber C; Hanser T; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Myatt GJ; Cross KP; Benfenati E; Raitano G; Mekenyan O; Petkov P; Bossa C; Benigni R; Battistelli CL; Giuliani A; Tcheremenskaia O; DeMeo C; Norinder U; Koga H; Jose C; Jeliazkova N; Kochev N; Paskaleva V; Yang C; Daga PR; Clark RD; Rathman J
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 30357358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
    Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DeepAmes: A deep learning-powered Ames test predictive model with potential for regulatory application.
    Li T; Liu Z; Thakkar S; Roberts R; Tong W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Oct; 144():105486. PubMed ID: 37633327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks.
    Tran TTV; Tayara H; Chong KT
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 176():108560. PubMed ID: 38754218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategy proposal using QSAR models to approach mutagenicity assessment of non intentionally added substances in recycled plastic resins.
    Djelassi I; Lancia P; Thuillier I; Ginestar J; Fioravanzo E; Baleydier A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 May; 187():114597. PubMed ID: 38492856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning - Predicting Ames mutagenicity of small molecules.
    Chu CSM; Simpson JD; O'Neill PM; Berry NG
    J Mol Graph Model; 2021 Dec; 109():108011. PubMed ID: 34555723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting Ames Mutagenicity Using Conformal Prediction in the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
    Norinder U; Ahlberg E; Carlsson L
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 30541036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolution of contradiction between in silico predictions and Ames test results for four pharmaceutically relevant impurities.
    Gunther WC; Kenyon MO; Cheung JR; Dugger RW; Dobo KL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91():68-76. PubMed ID: 29061373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini mutagenicity test: a miniaturized version of the Ames test used in a prescreening assay for point mutagenesis assessment.
    Flamand N; Meunier J; Meunier P; Agapakis-Caussé C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11287170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.
    Furuhama A; Kitazawa A; Yao J; Matos Dos Santos CE; Rathman J; Yang C; Ribeiro JV; Cross K; Myatt G; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Jeliazkova N; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Foster RS; Bossa C; Battistelli CL; Benigni R; Sawada T; Wasada H; Hashimoto T; Wu M; Barzilay R; Daga PR; Clark RD; Mestres J; Montero A; Gregori-Puigjané E; Petkov P; Ivanova H; Mekenyan O; Matthews S; Guan D; Spicer J; Lui R; Uesawa Y; Kurosaki K; Matsuzaka Y; Sasaki S; Cronin MTD; Belfield SJ; Firman JW; Spînu N; Qiu M; Keca JM; Gini G; Li T; Tong W; Hong H; Liu Z; Igarashi Y; Yamada H; Sugiyama KI; Honma M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2023; 34(12):983-1001. PubMed ID: 38047445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QSAR modeling without descriptors using graph convolutional neural networks: the case of mutagenicity prediction.
    Hung C; Gini G
    Mol Divers; 2021 Aug; 25(3):1283-1299. PubMed ID: 34146224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
    Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A perspective on the development of the Ames Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity assay.
    Mortelmans K
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 May; 841():14-16. PubMed ID: 31138405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity. Deductive Estimate of Risk from Existing Knowledge. Toxicity Prediction by Komputer Assisted Technology.
    Cariello NF; Wilson JD; Britt BH; Wedd DJ; Burlinson B; Gombar V
    Mutagenesis; 2002 Jul; 17(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 12110629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative type of Ames test allows for dynamic mutagenicity detection by online monitoring of respiration activity.
    Kauffmann K; Gremm L; Brendt J; Schiwy A; Bluhm K; Hollert H; Büchs J
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 726():137862. PubMed ID: 32481210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of false positive, contaminant-driven mutagenicity in impurities associated with the sotorasib drug substance.
    Coppi A; Davies R; Wegesser T; Ishida K; Karmel J; Han J; Aiello F; Xie Y; Corbett MT; Parsons AT; Monticello TM; Minocherhomji S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 131():105162. PubMed ID: 35331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydromorphone impurity 2,2-bishydromorphone does not exert mutagenic and clastogenic properties via
    Franckenstein D; Bothe MK; Hurtado SB; Westphal M
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 2023 Nov; 46(4):634-639. PubMed ID: 35603474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.