These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3606751)

  • 1. Fetal heart variability indices and the accuracy of variability measurements.
    Kubo T; Inaba J; Shigemitsu S; Akatsuka T
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 4(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 3606751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of variability (STV and LTV) indices by computer-simulated data].
    Kubo T; Shigemitsu S; Inaba J; Akatsuka T
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Feb; 35(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 6864011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The short-term variability index from abdominal fetal electrocardiogram].
    Ohno Y; Tsuji M; Tomioka M; Yamamoto T; Okada H
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 3973438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different sampling intervals on the measurement of intrapartum fetal heart rate variability.
    Wilcox MA; Wang W; Sahota DS; Dawkins RR; Chung TK; Chang AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):577-80. PubMed ID: 9083315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of doppler ultrasound and direct electrocardiography acquisition techniques for quantification of fetal heart rate variability.
    Jezewski J; Wrobel J; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 16686408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods for quantitating fetal heart rate variability.
    Laros RK; Wong WS; Heilbron DC; Parer JT; Shnider SM; Naylor H; Butler J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 128(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 326049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical value of short-term variation of fetal heart rate and its relationship with prenatal outcome].
    Zhang K; Ge MZ; He J; Jiao LJ; Yu P
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 42(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 17631761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Studies on computer processing of fetal heart beat intervals with the comparison to several analyzing methods (author's transl)].
    Arima T
    Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1981 Feb; 33(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 7234337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of mathematical indices of fetal heart rate variability with visual assessment in the human and sheep.
    Knopf K; Parer JT; Espinoza MI; Horton JI; Gunn AJ; Williams CE; Gluckman PD; Parer WJ
    J Dev Physiol; 1991 Dec; 16(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 1824118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [On the accuracy of fetal heart rate variability (STV and LTV) measurement].
    Kubo T; Akatsuka T; Inaba J; Shigemitsu S; Iwasaki H
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1985 Jun; 23(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 4068339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal heart rate recorder for long-duration use in active full-term pregnant women.
    Shono H; Muro M; Kohara M; Ito Y; Nagasawa T; Sugimori H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 8290200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heart rate features in fetal behavioural states.
    Lange S; Van Leeuwen P; Schneider U; Frank B; Hoyer D; Geue D; Grönemeyer D
    Early Hum Dev; 2009 Feb; 85(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 18757143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate.
    Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Feb; 39(2):106-18. PubMed ID: 19193367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Relations between neonatal heart rate variability and the behavioral state].
    Tsuji M; Ohno Y; Tomioka M; Fujibayashi H; Yamamoto T; Okada H
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 May; 38(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 3722951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
    Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abdominal electrocardiography in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kariniemi V; Rosti J
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 3820035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations in perinatal heart rate monitoring. I. A quantitative method of describing baseline variability of the fetal heart rate.
    Young BK; Weinstein HN; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1978 Apr; 20(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 671389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal short time variation during labor: a non-invasive alternative to fetal scalp pH measurements?
    Schiermeier S; Reinhard J; Hatzmann H; Zimmermann RC; Westhof G
    J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 19492916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.