These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures. Farage MA; Bjerke DL; Mahony C; Blackburn KL; Gerberick GF Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 14678210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of fragrance allergens and their dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) in 107 spray perfumes. Soo Lim D; Min Choi S; Kim KB; Yoon K; Kacew S; Sik Kim H; Lee BM J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2018; 81(22):1173-1185. PubMed ID: 30415634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Toxicological risk assessment using the example of potential contact sensitization to resorcinol]. Goebel C; Kock M; Merk H Hautarzt; 2019 Dec; 70(12):948-952. PubMed ID: 31754739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective quantitative risk assessment of skin sensitization caused by an antimicrobial agent used in a consumer product: 2,3,5,6-Tetrachloro-4-(methylsulfonyl) pyridine. Fukushima A; Morioka H; Kobayashi T; Katagiri R; Tanabe A; Sakunaga M; Takeyoshi M Contact Dermatitis; 2023 May; 88(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 36807334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Unique Molecular Signatures of Contact Dermatitis and Implications for Treatment. Leonard A; Guttman-Yassky E Clin Rev Allergy Immunol; 2019 Feb; 56(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29754191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probabilistic derivation of the interspecies assessment factor for skin sensitization. Bil W; Schuur AG; Ezendam J; Bokkers BGH Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():34-44. PubMed ID: 28545776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: which factors are relevant? (review of the literature). de Waard-van der Spek FB; Andersen KE; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Jun; 24(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 23373713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the new standard for eugenol designed to protect against contact sensitization protect those sensitized from elicitation of the reaction? Svedman C; Engfeldt M; Api AM; Politano VT; Belsito DV; Gruvberger B; Bruze M Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 22653067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic contact dermatitis: Adequacy of the default 10X assessment factor for human variability to protect infants and children. Felter S; Kern P; Ryan C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Nov; 99():116-121. PubMed ID: 30240832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Felter SP; White IR; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Dec; 45(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 11846748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]