197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36068311)
21. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.
Campanella G; Hanna MG; Geneslaw L; Miraflor A; Werneck Krauss Silva V; Busam KJ; Brogi E; Reuter VE; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Nat Med; 2019 Aug; 25(8):1301-1309. PubMed ID: 31308507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A multi-resolution model for histopathology image classification and localization with multiple instance learning.
Li J; Li W; Sisk A; Ye H; Wallace WD; Speier W; Arnold CW
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104253. PubMed ID: 33601084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region.
Aubreville M; Bertram CA; Marzahl C; Gurtner C; Dettwiler M; Schmidt A; Bartenschlager F; Merz S; Fragoso M; Kershaw O; Klopfleisch R; Maier A
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16447. PubMed ID: 33020510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association.
Rakha EA; Aleskandarani M; Toss MS; Green AR; Ball G; Ellis IO; Dalton LW
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Aug; 71(8):680-686. PubMed ID: 29535212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.
Melo PAS; Estivallet CLN; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Leite KRM
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e3198. PubMed ID: 34730614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: The TUPAC16 challenge.
Veta M; Heng YJ; Stathonikos N; Bejnordi BE; Beca F; Wollmann T; Rohr K; Shah MA; Wang D; Rousson M; Hedlund M; Tellez D; Ciompi F; Zerhouni E; Lanyi D; Viana M; Kovalev V; Liauchuk V; Phoulady HA; Qaiser T; Graham S; Rajpoot N; Sjöblom E; Molin J; Paeng K; Hwang S; Park S; Jia Z; Chang EI; Xu Y; Beck AH; van Diest PJ; Pluim JPW
Med Image Anal; 2019 May; 54():111-121. PubMed ID: 30861443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands.
van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Kuijpers CCHJ; van der Wall E; Overbeek LIH; Deckers IAG
Int J Cancer; 2020 Feb; 146(3):769-780. PubMed ID: 30977119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses.
Pantanowitz L; Hartman D; Qi Y; Cho EY; Suh B; Paeng K; Dhir R; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Song SY; Cho SY
Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 32622359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A whole slide image-based machine learning approach to predict ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) recurrence risk.
Klimov S; Miligy IM; Gertych A; Jiang Y; Toss MS; Rida P; Ellis IO; Green A; Krishnamurti U; Rakha EA; Aneja R
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Jul; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 31358020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-observer agreement among pathologists in grading the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Yamaguchi T; Mukai H; Akiyama F; Arihiro K; Masuda S; Kurosumi M; Kodama Y; Horii R; Tsuda H
Breast Cancer; 2018 Jan; 25(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28856554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep learning-based histotype diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma whole-slide pathology images.
Farahani H; Boschman J; Farnell D; Darbandsari A; Zhang A; Ahmadvand P; Jones SJM; Huntsman D; Köbel M; Gilks CB; Singh N; Bashashati A
Mod Pathol; 2022 Dec; 35(12):1983-1990. PubMed ID: 36065012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A deep learning approach for mitosis detection: Application in tumor proliferation prediction from whole slide images.
Nateghi R; Danyali H; Helfroush MS
Artif Intell Med; 2021 Apr; 114():102048. PubMed ID: 33875159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer.
Balkenhol MCA; Tellez D; Vreuls W; Clahsen PC; Pinckaers H; Ciompi F; Bult P; van der Laak JAWM
Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 99(11):1596-1606. PubMed ID: 31222166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: the malignancy grading and associations with prognosis.
Liu J; Li F; Liu X; Lang R; Liang R; Lu H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 37071267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative Evaluation of Breast Ductal Carcinoma Grading: A Deep-Learning Model and General Pathologists' Assessment Approach.
Köteles MM; Vigdorovits A; Kumar D; Mihai IM; Jurescu A; Gheju A; Bucur A; Harich OO; Olteanu GE
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 37510069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Quantify Glomerulosclerosis in Kidney Biopsy Specimens.
Marsh JN; Liu TC; Wilson PC; Swamidass SJ; Gaut JP
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2030939. PubMed ID: 33471115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
