These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3606863)

  • 1. Reaction time asymmetry through bilateral versus unilateral stimulus presentation.
    Boles DB
    Brain Cogn; 1987 Jul; 6(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 3606863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What bilateral displays do.
    Boles DB
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 2340152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry.
    Boles DB
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Mar; 24(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 8185893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation.
    Schmitz-Gielsdorf J; Willmes K; Vondenhoff C; Hartje W
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 3405402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries.
    Robertson LC; Lamb MR
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach to cerebral asymmetry: RT differences in simultaneous bimanual finger movement during verbal and nonverbal tasks.
    Wünscher T; Jordan K; Gille HG; Roth N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 2342853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.
    Beaumont JG; Colley M
    Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global versus local processing: is there a hemispheric dichotomy?
    Boles DB
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):445-55. PubMed ID: 6483171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced coding strategies and hemispheric differences in matching letter pairs.
    Edwards J; Venables PH
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 7162589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal-mirrored letter recognition, same-different judgment and cerebral dominance.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1982; 36(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 7095668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric resource limitations in comprehending ambiguous pictures.
    White H; Minor SW
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):182-94. PubMed ID: 2340150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric local/global processing revisited.
    Polich J; Aguilar V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Jun; 74(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 2392956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli.
    Michimata C; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):397-407. PubMed ID: 3601044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cerebral asymmetries and interhemispheric processes.
    Jeeves MA; Lamb A
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Aug; 29(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 3166699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral field interactions, hemispheric specialization and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time.
    Larson EB; Brown WS
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 May; 35(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 9153019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemisphere differences for components of mental rotation.
    Fischer SC; Pellegrino JW
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Feb; 7(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 3345264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.
    Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 6664482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left hemisphere superiority for visuospatial functions in left-handers.
    Marzi CA; Grabowska A; Tressoldi P; Bisiacchi PS
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Sep; 30(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 3166716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye.
    Westendorf DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 2527957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.