These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3606869)

  • 1. Relationship between certain radiographic and biologic characteristics in breast cancer.
    von Rosen A; Wiege M; Törnberg B; Hellström L; Skoog L; Somell A; Auer G
    Acta Oncol; 1987; 26(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 3606869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mammographic appearance of breast carcinomas of invasive ductal type: relationship with clinicopathological parameters, biological features and prognosis.
    Ildefonso C; Vazquez J; Guinea O; Perez A; Fernandez A; Corte MD; Junquera S; Gonzalez LO; Pravia P; Garcia-Moran M; Vizoso FJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 17118521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between mammographic pattern and estrogen receptor content in breast cancer.
    Broberg A; Glas U; Gustafsson SA; Hellström L; Somell A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1983; 3(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 6616077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography and morphobiologic characteristics of human breast cancer.
    Paradiso A; Mangia A; Barletta A; Marzullo F; Ventrella V; Racanelli A; Schittulli F; De Lena M
    Tumori; 1993 Dec; 79(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 8171744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Residual microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of the accuracies of mammography and MRI in predicting pathological residual tumor.
    An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 15(1):198. PubMed ID: 29110671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of invasive carcinomas detected by screening mammography: use of specimen mammography-guided fine-needle aspirates.
    Stomper PC; DeBloom JR; Levine E; Budnick RM; Stewart CC
    Clin Cancer Res; 1998 Jul; 4(7):1789-95. PubMed ID: 9676857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between mammographic features and hormone receptor content in patients with breast cancer.
    Ainge GR; Choplin RH; Bechtold RE; Muss HB; Case LD; Kute TE
    South Med J; 1989 Dec; 82(12):1506-11. PubMed ID: 2688129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
    Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathologic basis for differences in mammographic appearance.
    Wilson TE; Helvie MA; Oberman HA; Joynt LK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 7618541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-palpable invasive breast carcinomas from the Stockholm screening project.
    von Rosen A; Frisell J; Glas U; Hellström L; Nilsson R; Skoog L; Auer G
    Acta Oncol; 1989; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2706131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic features of local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy: comparison with that of the primary tumor.
    Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17453518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
    Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Hermann DG; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 2845470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.
    Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic microcalcifications and breast cancer tumorigenesis: a radiologic-pathologic analysis.
    Naseem M; Murray J; Hilton JF; Karamchandani J; Muradali D; Faragalla H; Polenz C; Han D; Bell DC; Brezden-Masley C
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():307. PubMed ID: 25896922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic features are associated with clinicopathological characteristics in invasive breast cancer.
    Jiang L; Ma T; Moran MS; Kong X; Li X; Haffty BG; Yang Q
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2327-34. PubMed ID: 21737659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Microcalcifications in non-palpable breast carcinoma. Analysis of 427 cases].
    Coopmans de Yoldi G; Viganotti G; Bergonzi S; Ferranti C; Piragine G; Cassano E; Barberini M; Greco M; Luini A; Sacchini V
    Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):611-4. PubMed ID: 8327763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between nuclear DNA distribution and estrogen receptors in human mammary carcinomas.
    Auer GU; Caspersson TO; Gustafsson SA; Humla SA; Ljung BM; Nordenskjöld BA; Silfverswärd C; Wallgren AS
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 7469203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The relationship between the receptor status and the mammographic picture in operable breast cancer].
    Ventrella V; Paradiso A; Farchi G; Tommasi S; Schittulli F; Racanelli A; De Lena M
    Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 2359855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.
    Vernet-Tomas M; Mojal S; Gamero R; Nicolau P; Rodríguez-Arana A; Plancarte F; Corominas JM; Serrano-Munne L; Carreras R; Sabadell D
    Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 27639877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.