These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36068942)

  • 1. Uncertainty quantification for ecological models with random parameters.
    Reimer JR; Adler FR; Golden KM; Narayan A
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2232-2244. PubMed ID: 36068942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
    Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty quantification in simulations of epidemics using polynomial chaos.
    Santonja F; Chen-Charpentier B
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():742086. PubMed ID: 22927889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.
    Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propagation of parametric uncertainty for the K+ channel model in mouse ventricular myocytes.
    Yuncheng Du ; Dongping Du
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5587-5590. PubMed ID: 28269521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and propagation in multi-scale modeling of cardiac electrophysiology.
    Hu Z; Du D; Du Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():57-74. PubMed ID: 30248513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability in spring phytoplankton blooms associated with ice retreat timing in the Pacific Arctic from 2003-2019.
    Waga H; Eicken H; Hirawake T; Fukamachi Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261418. PubMed ID: 34914776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
    Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty quantification of time-average quantities of chaotic systems using sensitivity-enhanced polynomial chaos expansion.
    Kantarakias KD; Papadakis G
    Phys Rev E; 2024 Apr; 109(4-1):044208. PubMed ID: 38755938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
    Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of algal bloom risk with uncertainties in lakes by integrating self-organizing map and fuzzy information theory.
    Chen Q; Rui H; Li W; Zhang Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 482-483():318-24. PubMed ID: 24657580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propagation of Parametric Uncertainty in Aliev-Panfilov Model of Cardiac Excitation.
    Son J; Du Y; Du D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5450-5453. PubMed ID: 30441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the stochastic Galerkin method to epidemic models with uncertainty in the parameters.
    Harman DB; Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2016 Jul; 277():25-37. PubMed ID: 27091743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and uncertainty of asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio quantification for amide proton transfer (APT) imaging at 3T: a Monte Carlo study.
    Yuan J; Zhang Q; Wang YX; Wei J; Zhou J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5139-42. PubMed ID: 24110892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixed uncertainty analysis on pumping by peristaltic hearts using Dempster-Shafer theory.
    He Y; Battista NA; Waldrop LD
    J Math Biol; 2024 Jun; 89(1):13. PubMed ID: 38879850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of a periodic stoichiometric model with application in predicting and controlling algal bloom in Bohai Sea off China.
    Song D; Fan M; Chen M; Wang H
    Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Dec; 16(1):119-138. PubMed ID: 30674112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
    Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Computational Neuroscience.
    Tennøe S; Halnes G; Einevoll GT
    Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():49. PubMed ID: 30154710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast uncertainty quantification of tracer distribution in the brain interstitial fluid with multilevel and quasi Monte Carlo.
    Croci M; Vinje V; Rognes ME
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Jan; 37(1):e3412. PubMed ID: 33174347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.