140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36068973)
1. Surgeon volume and patient-reported urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Population-based register study in Sweden.
Arnsrud Godtman R; Persson E; Bergengren O; Carlsson S; Johansson E; Robinsson D; Hugosson J; Stattin P
Scand J Urol; 2022; 56(5-6):343-350. PubMed ID: 36068973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons.
Fossati N; Di Trapani E; Gandaglia G; Dell'Oglio P; Umari P; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Mottrie A; Gaboardi F; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Suardi N
J Endourol; 2017 Sep; 31(9):872-877. PubMed ID: 28732186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nationwide, population-based study.
Godtman RA; Persson E; Cazzaniga W; Sandin F; Carlsson S; Ahlgren G; Johansson E; Robinsson D; Hugosson J; Stattin P
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253081. PubMed ID: 34138904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary continence recovery after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in relation to surgeon experience.
Fonseca J; Froes G; Moraes-Fontes MF; Rebola J; Lúcio R; Almeida M; Muresan C; Palmas A; Gaivão A; Matos C; Santos T; Dias D; Sousa I; Oliveira F; Ribeiro R; Lopez-Beltran A; Fraga A
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2503-2511. PubMed ID: 37528286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between extended pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary incontinence at early phase after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Lee K; Shiota M; Takamatsu D; Ushijima M; Blas L; Okabe A; Kajioka S; Goto S; Kinoshita F; Matsumoto T; Monji K; Kashiwagi E; Inokuchi J; Oda Y; Eto M
Int J Urol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):340-346. PubMed ID: 36478611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Checcucci E; Morra I; Passera R; Fiori C
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 26297603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeon heterogeneity significantly affects functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Swedish LAPPRO trial.
Nyberg M; Sjoberg DD; Carlsson SV; Wilderäng U; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Haglind E; Hugosson J; Bjartell A
BJU Int; 2021 Mar; 127(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 32916021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.
Nyberg M; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Sjoberg D; Wilderäng U; Carlsson SV; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):353-360. PubMed ID: 31158073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urologic latency time during uroflow stop test with electromyography: an incontinence detector in rehabilitation after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Boni A; Gervasoni F; Lomauro A; Del Zingaro M; Maiolino G; Galletti C; Ricci V; Mearini E
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2023 Feb; 59(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 36305651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.
Rechtman M; Forbes A; Millar JL; Evans M; Dodds L; Murphy DG; Evans SM
BMC Urol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 35130897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient reported outcome measures concerning urinary incontinence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of an online prediction model using clinical parameters, lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical experience.
Collette ERP; Klaver SO; Lissenberg-Witte BI; van den Ouden D; van Moorselaar RJA; Vis AN
J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 32930971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G;
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the CEASAR Study.
Reisz PA; Laviana AA; Zhao Z; Huang LC; Koyama T; Conwill R; Hoffman K; Goodman M; Hamilton AS; Wu XC; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Cooperberg MR; Hashibe M; O'Neil BB; Kaplan SH; Greenfield S; Penson DF; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1236-1241. PubMed ID: 32568605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
