150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36069658)
1. Neural Basis of the Implicit Learning of Complex Artificial Grammar with Nonadjacent Dependencies.
Ling X; Sun P; Zhao L; Jiang S; Lu Y; Cheng X; Guo X; Zhu X; Zheng L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 34(12):2375-2389. PubMed ID: 36069658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Broca's region: A causal role in implicit processing of grammars with crossed non-adjacent dependencies.
Uddén J; Ingvar M; Hagoort P; Petersson KM
Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():188-198. PubMed ID: 28453996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design.
Lieberman MD; Chang GY; Chiao J; Bookheimer SY; Knowlton BJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 15072678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Gillis JU; Gul A; Fox A; Parikh A; Arbel Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):292-302. PubMed ID: 34860559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age affects chunk-based, but not rule-based learning in artificial grammar acquisition.
Kürten J; De Vries MH; Kowal K; Zwitserlood P; Flöel A
Neurobiol Aging; 2012 Jul; 33(7):1311-7. PubMed ID: 21093109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of chunk strength on the performance of children with developmental dyslexia on artificial grammar learning task may be related to complexity.
Schiff R; Katan P; Sasson A; Kahta S
Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Jul; 67(2):180-199. PubMed ID: 28409401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning.
Skosnik PD; Mirza F; Gitelman DR; Parrish TB; Mesulam MM; Reber PJ
Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1306-14. PubMed ID: 12414270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning.
Hendricks MA; Conway CM; Kellogg RT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 23627281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.
Beesley T; Wills AJ; Le Pelley ME
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20081172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct neural networks for detecting violations of adjacent versus nonadjacent sequential dependencies: An fMRI study.
Conway CM; Eghbalzad L; Deocampo JA; Smith GNL; Na S; King TZ
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107175. PubMed ID: 32018026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploration of implicit artificial grammar learning in Parkinson's disease.
Peigneux P; Meulemans T; Van der Linden M; Salmon E; Petit H
Acta Neurol Belg; 1999 Jun; 99(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10427353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax.
Petersson KM; Folia V; Hagoort P
Brain Lang; 2012 Feb; 120(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 20943261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical stimulation of Broca's area enhances implicit learning of an artificial grammar.
de Vries MH; Barth AC; Maiworm S; Knecht S; Zwitserlood P; Flöel A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2427-36. PubMed ID: 19925194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.
Jin P; Lu Y; Ding N
Elife; 2020 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 32310082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit learning and dyslexia.
Folia V; Uddén J; Forkstam C; Ingvar M; Hagoort P; Petersson KM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():132-50. PubMed ID: 19076394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implicit Statistical Learning in L2 Sentence Processing: Individual Cognitive Differences.
Lee OS
J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1037-1060. PubMed ID: 37016091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.
Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ
Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial grammar learning is facilitated by distributed practice: Evidence from a letter reordering task.
Schiff R; Sasson A; Green H; Kahta S
Cogn Process; 2022 Feb; 23(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 34373971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface features can deeply affect artificial grammar learning.
Jiménez L; Mendes Oliveira H; Soares AP
Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102919. PubMed ID: 32200204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuronal correlates of familiarity-driven decisions in artificial grammar learning.
Thiel CM; Shanks DR; Henson RN; Dolan RJ
Neuroreport; 2003 Jan; 14(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12544844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
