These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring. Robinson MD; Johnson JT; Robertson DA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Sep; 6(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 11014053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues. Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Saraiva RB; Hope L; Horselenberg R; Ost J; Sauer JD; van Koppen PJ Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31699019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Remembering online and offline: the effects of retrieval contexts, cues, and intervals on autobiographical memory. Hou Y; Pan X; Cao X; Wang Q Memory; 2022 Apr; 30(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 34278949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eyewitness memory in the news can affect the strategic regulation of memory reporting. Butt MM; Colloff MF; Magner E; Flowe HD Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):763-774. PubMed ID: 33258419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the ease-of-retrieval effect in an eyewitness context. Groncki R; Beaudry JL; Sauer JD Memory; 2021 Feb; 29(2):234-254. PubMed ID: 33557719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories. Staugaard SR; Berntsen D Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):893-905. PubMed ID: 30725379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How events are reviewed matters: effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility. Lane SM; Mather M; Villa D; Morita SK Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):940-7. PubMed ID: 11820753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of cross-examination style questions on adult eyewitness accuracy depends on question type and eyewitness confidence. Wade KA; Spearing ER Memory; 2023 Feb; 31(2):163-178. PubMed ID: 36184815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of handedness consistency and saccade execution on eyewitness memory in cued- and free-recall procedures. Lyle KB Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 29295669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring the source monitoring. Luna K; Martín-Luengo B Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 23553316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of immediate recall and subsequent retrieval strategy on eyewitness memory. Ma J; Paterson HM; Temler M Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(5):788-805. PubMed ID: 36148393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory. Uzer T; Brown NR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():84-91. PubMed ID: 27940026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. Robinson MD; Johnson JT; Herndon F J Appl Psychol; 1997 Jun; 82(3):416-25. PubMed ID: 9190148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-relevance enhances susceptibility to false memory. Wang J; Wang B; Otgaar H; Patihis L; Sauerland M Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 38291970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility. LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]