These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36070825)

  • 1. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Establishment and preliminary clinical evaluation of edentulous custom trays designed and fabricated by chair-side CAD and 3D printing systems].
    Wang KP; Ye HQ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhou YS
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Apr; 51(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 30996381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial.
    Yang X; Liu Y; Li Y; Zhao Y; Di P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 33593675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Progress in research and application of the edentulous custom trays].
    Sun YC; Jin EL; Zhao T; Wang Y; Ye HQ; Zhou YS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 27806767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches.
    Liu Y; Di P; Zhao Y; Hao Q; Tian J; Cui H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):1007–1014. PubMed ID: 31107937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative analysis of the selective pressure impression technique using CAD-CAM technology: A pilot clinical study.
    Stein BE; Yoon HI; Mattie H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 33992466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.
    Sun Y; Chen H; Li H; Deng K; Zhao T; Wang Y; Zhou Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14958. PubMed ID: 29097699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of production and clinical working time of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom trays for complete denture].
    Wei L; Chen H; Zhou YS; Sun YC; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 28203010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: A dental technique.
    Qu F; Du X; Liu WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Implant Impression Accuracy Using Different Trays and Techniques With a 3D Superimposition Method.
    Unsal G; Caglar A; Tural M; Orhan M; Alkan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 0(0):1-19. PubMed ID: 38607357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of tissue stops on 3D-printed custom trays.
    Deng K; Chen H; Li R; Li L; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1807. PubMed ID: 30755638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chairside 3-D printed impression trays: a new approach to increase the accuracy of conventional implant impression taking? An in vitro study.
    Schmidt A; Berschin C; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Dec; 9(1):47. PubMed ID: 38052992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Edentulous Tray Modification on the Pressure Distribution of the Impression: An In Vitro Study.
    Chang Y; Maeda Y; Wada M; Gonda T; Ikebe K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(3):278-280. PubMed ID: 31034545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application evaluation of prefabricated rigid connecting bar in implants immediate impression preparation of edentulous jaw].
    Wang J; Yu HJ; Sun JD; Qiu LX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Feb; 54(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 35165489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.