270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36071074)
1. PLAS-5k: Dataset of Protein-Ligand Affinities from Molecular Dynamics for Machine Learning Applications.
Korlepara DB; Vasavi CS; Jeurkar S; Pal PK; Roy S; Mehta S; Sharma S; Kumar V; Muvva C; Sridharan B; Garg A; Modee R; Bhati AP; Nayar D; Priyakumar UD
Sci Data; 2022 Sep; 9(1):548. PubMed ID: 36071074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PLAS-20k: Extended Dataset of Protein-Ligand Affinities from MD Simulations for Machine Learning Applications.
Korlepara DB; C S V; Srivastava R; Pal PK; Raza SH; Kumar V; Pandit S; Nair AG; Pandey S; Sharma S; Jeurkar S; Thakran K; Jaglan R; Verma S; Ramachandran I; Chatterjee P; Nayar D; Priyakumar UD
Sci Data; 2024 Feb; 11(1):180. PubMed ID: 38336857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.
Wang C; Nguyen PH; Pham K; Huynh D; Le TB; Wang H; Ren P; Luo R
J Comput Chem; 2016 Oct; 37(27):2436-46. PubMed ID: 27510546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PharmRF: A machine-learning scoring function to identify the best protein-ligand complexes for structure-based pharmacophore screening with high enrichments.
Kumar SP; Dixit NY; Patel CN; Rawal RM; Pandya HA
J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(12):847-863. PubMed ID: 35301752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Zhai J; He X; Sun Y; Wan Z; Ji B; Liu S; Li S; Wang J
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 24(30):18291-18305. PubMed ID: 35880533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
Jain T; Jayaram B
FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An accurate free energy estimator: based on MM/PBSA combined with interaction entropy for protein-ligand binding affinity.
Huang K; Luo S; Cong Y; Zhong S; Zhang JZH; Duan L
Nanoscale; 2020 May; 12(19):10737-10750. PubMed ID: 32388542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sfcnn: a novel scoring function based on 3D convolutional neural network for accurate and stable protein-ligand affinity prediction.
Wang Y; Wei Z; Xi L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):222. PubMed ID: 35676617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
