BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36071652)

  • 1. A Realistic Breast Phantom Proposal for 3D Image Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Polat A; Kumrular RK
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221104567. PubMed ID: 36071652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 25563259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
    Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
    Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Influence on Image Reconstruction Methods on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Guided Vacuum-assisted Biopsy for Clustered Microcalcifications].
    Kuwabara N; Asano S; Kawashima H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 35185097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-beam X-ray source breast tomosynthesis reconstruction with different algorithms.
    Zhou W; Qian X; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010; 7622():76220H. PubMed ID: 27053823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive multiscale anisotropic diffusion regularized image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Liu Y; Zhang C; Li W; Tang Y; Gao X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):993-1008. PubMed ID: 30374771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021901. PubMed ID: 24506622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):904-14. PubMed ID: 21041158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using 2D and 3D total variation minimization.
    Ertas M; Yildirim I; Kamasak M; Akan A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Oct; 12():112. PubMed ID: 24172584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.