158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36071652)
21. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Rose SD; Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Pan X
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e279-e296. PubMed ID: 28901614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simultaneous correction of sensitivity and spatial resolution in projection-based magnetic particle imaging.
Murase K
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1845-1859. PubMed ID: 32003025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT.
Makeev A; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081904. PubMed ID: 23927318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.
Vecchio S; Albanese A; Vignoli P; Taibi A
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 21193910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Material decomposition for simulated dual-energy breast computed tomography via hybrid optimization method.
Komolafe TE; Du Q; Zhang Y; Wu Z; Zhang C; Li M; Zheng J; Yang X
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1037-1054. PubMed ID: 33044222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultra-Fast Image Reconstruction of Tomosynthesis Mammography Using GPU.
Arefan D; Talebpour A; Ahmadinejhad N; Kamali Asl A
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2015 Jun; 5(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 26171373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Model-based deep CNN-regularized reconstruction for digital breast tomosynthesis with a task-based CNN image assessment approach.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 68(24):. PubMed ID: 37988758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep-learning-based projection-domain breast thickness estimation for shape-prior iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lee S; Kim H; Lee H; Cho S
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3670-3682. PubMed ID: 35297075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning digital mammography system for tomosynthesis.
Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Douglas TS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 27002901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom.
Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Ghammraoui B; Cheng WC; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3883-3892. PubMed ID: 31135960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
