These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36072017)
41. Circular economy strategies in supply chains, enhancing resource efficiency and sustainable development goals. Gao JQ; Li D; Qiao GH; Jia QR; Li SR; Gao HL Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(6):8751-8767. PubMed ID: 38180660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Supply chain in transition navigating economic growth and environmental sustainability through education. Zhang D; Shi L; Liu G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(8):12321-12339. PubMed ID: 38233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Sustainability of Social Enterprises in Korea? Qing C; Jin S Front Psychol; 2022; 13():859170. PubMed ID: 35310265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The influence of corporate social responsibility, ability, reputation, and transparency on hotel customer loyalty in the U.S.: a gender-based approach. Kim SB; Kim DY Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1537. PubMed ID: 27652110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The influence of digital platform on the implementation of corporate social responsibility: from the perspective of environmental science development to explore its potential role in public health. Wang M; Yuan R; Guan X; Wang Z; Zeng Y; Liu T Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1343546. PubMed ID: 38711767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Moderating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Toward Environment on Relationship Between Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Performance. Azam T; Malik SY; Ren D; Yuan W; Mughal YH; Ullah I; Fiaz M; Riaz S Front Psychol; 2022; 13():876516. PubMed ID: 35707670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Trust, Corporate Reputation, and Brand Equity. Zhao Y; Abbas M; Samma M; Ozkut T; Munir M; Rasool SF Front Psychol; 2021; 12():766422. PubMed ID: 34858294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication through Social Media on Banking Customer E-WOM and Loyalty in Times of Crisis. Zhang D; Mahmood A; Ariza-Montes A; Vega-Muñoz A; Ahmad N; Han H; Sial MS Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33946787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Do you reap what you sow? Driving mechanism of supply chain transparency on consumers' indirect reciprocity. He S Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1081297. PubMed ID: 36844304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accessing the Influence of Consumer Participation on Purchase Intention Toward Community Group Buying Platform. Hongsuchon T; Li J Front Psychol; 2022; 13():887959. PubMed ID: 35837624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Coordination of Three-Tier Supply Chain Based on Stochastic Differential Game. Yang M; Yang Z; Li Y; Liang X Front Psychol; 2022; 13():783998. PubMed ID: 35197898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How do environmental values impact green product purchase intention? The moderating role of green trust. Li G; Yang L; Zhang B; Li X; Chen F Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(33):46020-46034. PubMed ID: 33884555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Green Synergy: Interplay of corporate social responsibility, green intellectual capital, and green ambidextrous innovation for sustainable performance in the industry 4.0 era. Zahid Z; Zhang J; Shahzad MA; Junaid M; Shrivastava A PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0306349. PubMed ID: 39116179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Empathy of Marine Aquaculture on Aquatic Products Consumption. Xilin L; Wu Y; Zeng Y; Ma T; Wang Y; Zhang Q Front Psychol; 2022; 13():902889. PubMed ID: 35903749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Adoption of green supply chain management in developing countries: role of consumer cooperation, eco-design, and green marketing. Bashar S; Wang D; Rafiq M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(40):92594-92610. PubMed ID: 37495804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Give Goods or Give Money? The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing Approach on Consumers' Purchase Intention. Ye S; Liu Y; Gu S; Chen H Front Psychol; 2020; 11():533445. PubMed ID: 33551891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessing the role of sustainable strategies in alleviating energy poverty: an environmental sustainability paradigm. Batool K; Zhao ZY; Irfan M; Żywiołek J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(25):67109-67130. PubMed ID: 37103699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Corporate social responsibility and customer's responses: CSR authenticity and government intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Balqiah TE; Astuti RD; Martdianty F; Hati SRH Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15962. PubMed ID: 37220485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of green marketing mix, green customer value, and attitude on green purchase intention: evidence from the USA. Ahmed RR; Streimikiene D; Qadir H; Streimikis J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(5):11473-11495. PubMed ID: 36094715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Corporate social responsibility and patient's intention to revisit: A serial mediation study witnessing the healthcare sector. Aman-Ullah A; Ali A; Mehmood W; Fareed M; Aman-Ullah A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):22078-22088. PubMed ID: 36282374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]