These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36072090)

  • 41. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists.
    Bäuml KH; Kuhbandner C
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Dec; 31(8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 15058680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests.
    McCabe DP
    J Mem Lang; 2008 Feb; 58(2):480-494. PubMed ID: 19633737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retrieval practice enhances memory for names in survivors of stroke.
    Evans FA; Wong D; Stolwyk RJ
    Neuropsychology; 2020 Nov; 34(8):874-880. PubMed ID: 33030916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Test expectancy and memory for important information.
    Middlebrooks CD; Murayama K; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):972-985. PubMed ID: 28095010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.
    Liu Y; Rosburg T; Gao C; Weber C; Guo C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():134-147. PubMed ID: 28552619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks.
    Runge Y; Frings C; Tempel T
    Memory; 2019 Nov; 27(10):1462-1467. PubMed ID: 31418314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory.
    Sutterer DW; Awh E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 26404635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
    Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Influences of recollective experience and self-other differences in episodic retrieval on a following recall test].
    Horiuchi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Jun; 75(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15747546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.
    Zimmer HD; Helstrup T; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):658-70. PubMed ID: 10855424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Testing enhances motor practice.
    Tempel T; Frings C
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1270-1283. PubMed ID: 31020516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
    Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KT
    Dev Sci; 2016 Nov; 19(6):992-998. PubMed ID: 26614638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25730637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.