These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36072109)

  • 1. Binding between Responses is not Modulated by Grouping of Response Effects.
    Selimi S; Frings C; Moeller B
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):42. PubMed ID: 36072109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Kiesel A; Frings C
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 36072092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brightness versus darkness: The influence of stimulus intensity on the distractor-response binding effect.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103224. PubMed ID: 33316459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.
    Jiang J; Brashier NM; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(44):14885-95. PubMed ID: 26538657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features.
    Moeller B; Pfister R; Kunde W; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1627-1632. PubMed ID: 31325038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of stress on distractor-response bindings.
    Singh T; Domes G; Frings C
    Stress; 2021 Nov; 24(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 34060422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binding time: Investigations on the integration of visual stimulus duration.
    Köllnberger K; Bogon J; Dreisbach G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2312-2328. PubMed ID: 36377802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for a Selective Influence of Short-Term Experiences on the Retrieval of Item-Specific Long-Term Bindings.
    Dames H; Kiesel A; Pfeuffer CU
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 36072120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Role of Memory Representations in Action Control: Neurophysiological Decoding Reveals the Reactivation of Integrated Stimulus-Response Feature Representations.
    Eggert E; Takacs A; Münchau A; Beste C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 34(7):1246-1258. PubMed ID: 35552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From simple to complex actions: Response-response bindings as a new approach to action sequences.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 30211579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating the irrelevant sound.
    Moeller B; Rothermund K; Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):258-64. PubMed ID: 22580408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations.
    Takacs A; Bluschke A; Kleimaker M; Münchau A; Beste C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Apr; 42(5):1313-1327. PubMed ID: 33236838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All together now: Simultaneous feature integration and feature retrieval in action control.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):512-520. PubMed ID: 34713410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in controlling stimulus-response integration: a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study.
    Zmigrod S; Colzato LS; Hommel B
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(4):516-20. PubMed ID: 24797449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using temporal EEG signal decomposition to identify specific neurophysiological correlates of distractor-response bindings proposed by the theory of event coding.
    Opitz A; Beste C; Stock AK
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116524. PubMed ID: 31926281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based grouping benefits without integrated feature representations in visual working memory.
    Chen S; Kocsis A; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Apr; 83(3):1357-1374. PubMed ID: 33073323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 29869024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.