These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36072125)

  • 1. Frankly, My Error, I Don't Give a Damn: Retrieval of Goal-Based but Not Coactivation-Based Bindings after Erroneous Responses.
    Parmar J; Foerster A; Pfister R; Rothermund K
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):34. PubMed ID: 36072125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-Based Binding of Irrelevant Stimulus Features for Action Slips.
    Foerster A; Rothermund K; Parmar JJ; Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Jul; 68(4):206-213. PubMed ID: 34918539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is left after an error? Towards a comprehensive account of goal-based binding and retrieval.
    Foerster A; Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jan; 85(1):120-139. PubMed ID: 36451075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor-based response retrieval.
    Wiswede D; Rothermund K; Frings C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 38(10):3496-506. PubMed ID: 23961772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for associated stimuli.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Mocke V; Giesen CG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binding and Retrieval of Response Durations: Subtle Evidence for Episodic Processing of Continuous Movement Features.
    Pfister R; Bogon J; Foerster A; Kunde W; Moeller B
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 36072101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. All together now: Simultaneous feature integration and feature retrieval in action control.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):512-520. PubMed ID: 34713410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All.
    Rothermund K; Gollnick N; Giesen CG
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):39. PubMed ID: 36072098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus-Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.
    Giesen C; Löhl V; Rothermund K; Koranyi N
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1369. PubMed ID: 30123169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2014; 10(2):68-80. PubMed ID: 25157302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for a Selective Influence of Short-Term Experiences on the Retrieval of Item-Specific Long-Term Bindings.
    Dames H; Kiesel A; Pfeuffer CU
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 36072120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Role of Memory Representations in Action Control: Neurophysiological Decoding Reveals the Reactivation of Integrated Stimulus-Response Feature Representations.
    Eggert E; Takacs A; Münchau A; Beste C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 34(7):1246-1258. PubMed ID: 35552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation.
    Giesen C; Scherdin K; Rothermund K
    Learn Behav; 2017 Jun; 45(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 27800568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating distractor inhibition and episodic retrieval processes in children: No evidence for developmental deficits.
    Giesen C; Weissmann F; Rothermund K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():212-231. PubMed ID: 28946043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Giesen CG
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):36. PubMed ID: 36072091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From simple to complex actions: Response-response bindings as a new approach to action sequences.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 30211579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binding Error-Induced Control States.
    Foerster A; Schiltenwolf M; Dignath D; Pfister R
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):24. PubMed ID: 36072103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.