208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36072362)
1. Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jin S; Fu L; Jiang J; Ye X; Liu H; Chen Y; Pu S; Wu S; Xue Y
J Interv Cardiol; 2022; 2022():6013474. PubMed ID: 36072362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ravi V; Poudyal A; Abid QU; Larsen T; Krishnan K; Sharma PS; Trohman RG; Huang HD
Europace; 2021 May; 23(5):710-721. PubMed ID: 33523184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu X; Gui C; Wen W; He Y; Dai W; Zhong G
J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():5591590. PubMed ID: 34149322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.
Hansom SP; Alqarawi W; Birnie DH; Golian M; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Klein A; Green MS; Davis DR; Sheppard-Perkins E; Ramirez FD; Nair GM; Sadek MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 33751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen CF; Wu J; Jin CL; Liu MJ; Xu YZ
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1631-1640. PubMed ID: 33107625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kottmaier M; Popa M; Bourier F; Reents T; Cifuentes J; Semmler V; Telishevska M; Otgonbayar U; Koch-Büttner K; Lennerz C; Bartkowiak M; Kornmayer M; Rousseva E; Brkic A; Grebmer C; Kolb C; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 31872249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Network meta-analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Tokavanich N; Prasitlumkum N; Kewcharoen J; Chokesuwattanaskul R; Phannajit J; Cheungpasitporn W; Akoum N; Ranjan R; Bunch TJ; Navaravong L
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Apr; 34(4):869-879. PubMed ID: 36691892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High power short duration versus low power long duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Parlavecchio A; Vetta G; Coluccia G; Pistelli L; Caminiti R; Ajello M; Magnocavallo M; Dattilo G; Foti R; Carerj S; Crea P; Chierchia GB; de Asmundis C; Della Rocca DG; Palmisano P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1430-1439. PubMed ID: 37812165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Khanra D; Hamid A; Deshpande S; Mukherjee A; Petkar S; Saeed M; Basu-Ray I
Anatol J Cardiol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 35191380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-power short duration and low-power long duration in atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.
Kewcharoen J; Techorueangwiwat C; Kanitsoraphan C; Leesutipornchai T; Akoum N; Bunch TJ; Navaravong L
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 33155303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of very high-power short-duration, high-power short-duration, and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Junarta J; Rodriguez S; Ullah W; Siddiqui MU; Riley JM; Patel A; O'Neill P; Dikdan SJ; Fradin JJ; Rosen JL; Frisch DR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 46(12):1609-1634. PubMed ID: 37971718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of high power short duration in atrial fibrillation ablation - a superior efficient ablation strategy.
Xu M; Yang Y; Zhang D; Jiang W
Acta Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 77(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 34218737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of high power shorter duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li MF; Wu J; Jin CL; Chen CF; Xu YZ
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Apr; 75(4):e13732. PubMed ID: 32975347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of high-power short duration atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Lüsebrink U; Behnes M; Akin I; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 35441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Chen CC; Lee PT; Van Ba V; Chuang CM; Lin YJ; Lo LW; Hu YF; Chung FP; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Liu CM; Wu CI; Lugtu IC; Jain A; Chang SL; Chen SA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Aug; 21(1):387. PubMed ID: 34372779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force-sensing catheters.
Dello Russo A; D'Angelo L; Compagnucci P; Cipolletta L; Parisi Q; Valeri Y; Campanelli F; Volpato G; Carboni L; Ciliberti G; Stronati GE; Barbarossa A; La Piscopia V; Bondavalli B; Guerra F; Natale A; Casella M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Apr; 67(3):549-557. PubMed ID: 37584862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
Ravi V; Poudyal A; Pulipati P; Larsen T; Krishnan K; Trohman RG; Sharma PS; Huang HD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2559-2571. PubMed ID: 32671920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Dikdan SJ; Junarta J; Bodempudi S; Upadhyay N; Pang Z; Frisch DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 33415782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial.
Joza J; Nair GM; Birnie DH; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Sarrazin JF; Champagne J; Bernick J; Wells GA; Essebag V;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 37990448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: A review.
Winkle RA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 32(10):2813-2823. PubMed ID: 33382506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
