BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36074543)

  • 1. Understanding Gender Biases and Differences in Web-Based Reviews of Sanctioned Physicians Through a Machine Learning Approach: Mixed Methods Study.
    Barnett J; Bjarnadóttir MV; Anderson D; Chen C
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Sep; 6(9):e34902. PubMed ID: 36074543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.
    Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews.
    Saifee DH; Hudnall M; Raja U
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e31659. PubMed ID: 35394435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
    Hao H; Zhang K
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sentiment analysis of pain physician reviews on Healthgrades: a physician review website.
    Cheng CP; Owusu T; Shekane P; Patel AM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37451825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.
    Morena N; Zelt N; Nguyen D; Dionne E; Rentschler CA; Greyson D; Meguerditchian AN
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 May; 7():e39857. PubMed ID: 37140959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of sentiment and word frequency analysis of physician review sites to evaluate refractive surgery care.
    Vought V; Vought R; Lee AS; Zhou I; Garneni M; Greenstein SA
    Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res; 2024; 4(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 38590556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A natural language processing approach to uncover patterns among online ratings of otolaryngologists.
    Vasan V; Cheng CP; Lerner DK; Vujovic D; van Gerwen M; Iloreta AM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Dec; 137(12):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 36938802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
    Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Association Between Linguistic Characteristics of Physicians' Communication and Their Economic Returns: Mixed Method Study.
    Geng S; He Y; Duan L; Yang C; Wu X; Liang G; Niu B
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jan; 26():e42850. PubMed ID: 38206657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician Review Websites: Understanding Patient Satisfaction with Ophthalmologists Using Natural Language Processing.
    Jo JJ; Cheng CP; Ying S; Chelnis JG
    J Ophthalmol; 2023; 2023():4762460. PubMed ID: 36938345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing Embedded Taxonomy and Mining Patients' Interests From Web-Based Physician Reviews: Mixed-Methods Approach.
    Li J; Liu M; Li X; Liu X; Liu J
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Aug; 20(8):e254. PubMed ID: 30115610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Web-Based Consumer Reviews as a Resource for Drug Performance.
    Adusumalli S; Lee H; Hoi Q; Koo SL; Tan IB; Ng PC
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Aug; 17(8):e211. PubMed ID: 26319108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bifurcation of Patient Reviews: An Analysis of Trends in Online Ratings.
    Devgan LL; Klein EJ; Fox S; Ozturk T
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e2781. PubMed ID: 32440443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Web-Based Ratings on Patient Choice of a Primary Care Physician Versus a Specialist: Randomized Controlled Experiment.
    Li S; Hubner A
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jun; 21(6):e11188. PubMed ID: 31254337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
    Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
    Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
    J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.