192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36074789)
41. Comparison of subpectoral versus dual-plane implant based immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-areola sparing mastectomy.
Ozgur I; Kurul S; Bademler S; Karanlik H
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2021 Dec; 66(6):447-458. PubMed ID: 33223365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Transition from Round to Shaped Implants in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Our Preferred Approach and Clinical Outcomes.
Imahiyerobo TA; Small KH; Sackeyfio R; Hoffman H; Talmor M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Apr; 41(2):284-292. PubMed ID: 28032163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in Hodgkin's patients with prior mantle irradiation.
Bacilious N; Cordeiro PG; Disa JJ; Hidalgo DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 11786799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The modified serratus anterior fascia flap improves satisfaction and long-term results in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: A retrospective study.
Cristofari S; Bertrand B; Rem K; Revol M; Stivala A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Apr; 74(4):800-808. PubMed ID: 33189619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Optimizing Patient Selection for Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Wise-Pattern Skin-Reducing Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts.
Inbal A; Gur E; Lemelman BT; Barsuk D; Menes T; Leshem D; Barnea Y
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 41(5):1058-1067. PubMed ID: 28593488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. One-step breast reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Rancati A; Soderini A; Dorr J; Gercovich G; Tessari L; Gonzalez E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1671-5. PubMed ID: 23932524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does Implant Surface Texture Affect the Risk of Capsular Contracture in Subglandular Breast Augmentation and Breast Augmentation-Mastopexy?
Lista F; Austin RE; Saheb-Al-Zamani M; Ahmad J
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Apr; 40(5):499-512. PubMed ID: 31529039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Risk Factor Analysis for Survival of Becker-Type Expander in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Yazar S; Karadag EC; Altinkaya A; Kara H; Uras C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Aug; 42(4):971-979. PubMed ID: 29523904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.
Lamaris GA; Butler CE; Deva AK; Miranda RN; Hunt KK; Connell T; Lipa JE; Clemens MW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):51S-58S. PubMed ID: 30817556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The clinical course of immediate breast implant reconstruction after breast cancer.
Hvilsom GB; Friis S; Frederiksen K; Steding-Jessen M; Henriksen TF; Lipworth L; McLaughlin JK; Elberg JJ; Damsgaard TE; Hölmich LR
Acta Oncol; 2011 Oct; 50(7):1045-52. PubMed ID: 21604960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): long-term outcomes and complications.
Salzberg CA; Dunavant C; Nocera N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 23153519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multicenter study on breast reconstruction outcome using Becker implants.
Scuderi N; Alfano C; Campus GV; Rubino C; Chiummariello S; Puddu A; Mazzocchi M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Feb; 35(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20676887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction.
Marquez MP; Fernandez-Riera R; Cardona HV; Flores JMR
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 16(1):80. PubMed ID: 29665804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction in Women Older than 65 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Complication Rate and Overall Outcomes.
Knackstedt R; Gatherwright J; Moreira A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):251-256. PubMed ID: 29369976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Application of acellular bovine pericardium patch in implant based immediate breast reconstruction].
Ding BW; Wang HQ; He SS; Wang S; Huang QF; Han CY; Liu J; Yin ZM; Sun JY; Wang Y; Yin J
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 60(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 35078299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. No differences in aesthetic outcome or patient satisfaction between anatomically shaped and round expandable implants in bilateral breast reconstructions: a randomized study.
Gahm J; Edsander-Nord Å; Jurell G; Wickman M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1419-1427. PubMed ID: 20639801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
