192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36076166)
1. Evolutionary changes in gene expression profiles associated with the coevolution of male and female genital parts among closely related ground beetle species.
Nomura S; Sota T
BMC Genomics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):637. PubMed ID: 36076166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of Sex-Concordant Gene Expression in the Coevolution of Exaggerated Male and Female Genitalia in a Beetle Group.
Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 38(9):3593-3605. PubMed ID: 33905498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Heterochrony and growth rate variation mediate the development of divergent genital morphologies in closely related Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Terada K; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
Evol Dev; 2021 Jan; 23(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 33245198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene expression during genital morphogenesis in the ground beetle Carabus maiyasanus.
Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
Insect Sci; 2020 Oct; 27(5):975-986. PubMed ID: 31318143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of two closely related ground beetle species with marked genital divergence using pyrosequencing.
Fujimaki K; Fujisawa T; Yazawa S; Nishimura O; Sota T
Zoolog Sci; 2014 Sep; 31(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25186930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive Character Displacement in Genital Morphology in
Nishimura T; Nagata N; Terada K; Xia T; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):E76-E90. PubMed ID: 35175894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.
Fujisawa T; Sasabe M; Nagata N; Takami Y; Sota T
Sci Adv; 2019 Jun; 5(6):eaav9939. PubMed ID: 31249868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of sexually antagonistic genital morphologies on female reproduction and wild population demography.
Takami Y; Fukuhara T; Yokoyama J; Kawata M
Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2449-2461. PubMed ID: 30238547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of extremely large male genitalia under spatial limitation.
Terada K; Furumoto C; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
Evol Dev; 2024 Jun; ():e12488. PubMed ID: 38927009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology due to cascade reinforcement in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Xia T; Nishimura T; Nagata N; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):169-182. PubMed ID: 36357996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of relative trait size and shape: insights from the genitalia of dung beetles.
Parzer HF; David Polly P; Moczek AP
Dev Genes Evol; 2018 Mar; 228(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 29423654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5231-9. PubMed ID: 21040054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Takami Y; Sota T
J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1385-95. PubMed ID: 17584233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How the length of genital parts affects copulation performance in a carabid beetle: implications for correlated genital evolution between the sexes.
Okuzaki Y; Sota T
J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24471576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct and indirect effects of male genital elaboration in female seed beetles.
Arnqvist G; Grieshop K; Hotzy C; Rönn J; Polak M; Rowe L
Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1954):20211068. PubMed ID: 34229496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid divergent evolution of internal female genitalia and the coevolution of male genital morphology revealed by micro-computed tomography.
Sloan NS; Harvey MS; Huey JA; Simmons LW
Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232883. PubMed ID: 38290544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Female-driven intersexual coevolution in beetle genitalia.
Genevcius BC; Baker J; Bianchi FM; Marvaldi AE
J Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):957-965. PubMed ID: 32277841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles.
Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 17327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual conflict and correlated evolution between male persistence and female resistance traits in the seed beetle
Dougherty LR; van Lieshout E; McNamara KB; Moschilla JA; Arnqvist G; Simmons LW
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 May; 284(1855):. PubMed ID: 28539510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
Kyogoku D; Sota T
J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]