These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36077971)

  • 1. Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies.
    Chen S; Wu Z; Sleipness OR; Wang H
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(17):. PubMed ID: 36077971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public Health Considerations Associated with the Location and Operation of Off-Leash Dog Parks.
    Rahim T; Barrios PR; McKee G; McLaws M; Kosatsky T
    J Community Health; 2018 Apr; 43(2):433-440. PubMed ID: 29027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reported off-leash frequency and perception of risk for gastrointestinal parasitism are not associated in owners of urban park-attending dogs: A multifactorial investigation.
    Smith AF; Semeniuk CA; Rock MJ; Massolo A
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jul; 120(3-4):336-48. PubMed ID: 25979855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in visitor profiles and activity patterns following dog supportive modifications to parks: A natural experiment on the health impact of an urban policy.
    McCormack GR; Graham TM; Swanson K; Massolo A; Rock MJ
    SSM Popul Health; 2016 Dec; 2():237-243. PubMed ID: 29349143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical activity patterns in urban neighbourhood parks: insights from a multiple case study.
    McCormack GR; Rock M; Swanson K; Burton L; Massolo A
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Sep; 14():962. PubMed ID: 25230763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fecal contamination of urban parks by domestic dogs and tragedy of the commons.
    Mori K; Rock M; McCormack G; Liccioli S; Giunchi D; Marceau D; Stefanakis E; Massolo A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3462. PubMed ID: 36859468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User behaviors in a community-based multifunctional urban park with dog friendly area.
    Kase Y; Koda N
    Behav Processes; 2024 Jun; 219():105048. PubMed ID: 38777169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study.
    Fontán-Vela M; Rivera-Navarro J; Gullón P; Díez J; Anguelovski I; Franco M
    Health Place; 2021 Sep; 71():102660. PubMed ID: 34454253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Dog Parks and the Contribution to Physical Activity for Their Owners.
    Evenson KR; Shay E; Williamson S; Cohen DA
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2016 Jun; 87(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 26932539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social carrying capacity and emotion dynamics in urban national parks during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Xiao X; Gao J; Lu J; Li P; Zhang Y
    J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100451. PubMed ID: 38620877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationships between urban parks, residents' physical activity, and mental health benefits: A case study from Beijing, China.
    Liu H; Li F; Li J; Zhang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Apr; 190():223-230. PubMed ID: 28056355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis.
    Geng DC; Innes J; Wu W; Wang G
    J For Res (Harbin); 2021; 32(2):553-567. PubMed ID: 33204057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access to off-leash parks, street pattern and dog walking among adults.
    McCormack GR; Rock M; Sandalack B; Uribe FA
    Public Health; 2011 Aug; 125(8):540-6. PubMed ID: 21803384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a public park for physical activity in the Caribbean: evidence from a mixed methods study in Jamaica.
    Cunningham-Myrie CA; Royal-Thomas TYN; Bailey AE; Gustat J; Theall KP; Harrison JE; Reid ME
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):894. PubMed ID: 31286918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
    Talal ML; Santelmann MV
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating tick density and park visitor behaviors to assess the risk of tick exposure in urban parks on Staten Island, New York.
    Hassett E; Diuk-Wasser M; Harrington L; Fernandez P
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):1602. PubMed ID: 35999523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing the use of urban green spaces in Coimbra (Portugal).
    Pinto L; Ferreira CSS; Pereira P
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148293. PubMed ID: 34147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unleashing physical activity: an observational study of park use, dog walking, and physical activity.
    Temple V; Rhodes R; Wharf Higgins J
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 Aug; 8(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 21832291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits.
    Winter SJ; Sheats JL; Salvo D; Banda JA; Quinn J; Rivera BR; King AC
    J Urban Health; 2020 Aug; 97(4):529-542. PubMed ID: 32613496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived Health Benefits and Willingness to Pay for Parks by Park Users: Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
    Henderson-Wilson C; Sia KL; Veitch J; Staiger PK; Davidson P; Nicholls P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 May; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 28505123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.