These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36078267)

  • 1. Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.
    Boboc RG; Voinea GD; Buzdugan ID; Antonya C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.
    Voinea GD; Boboc RG; Buzdugan ID; Antonya C; Yannis G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the Behaviour Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework in interventions for mobile phone driver distraction: A scoping review.
    Demir B; Demir S; Wickens CM; Hoseinzadeh Nooshabadi M; Rodak T; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107369. PubMed ID: 38061292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
    Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobile phone conversation distraction: Understanding differences in impact between simulator and naturalistic driving studies.
    Wijayaratna KP; Cunningham ML; Regan MA; Jian S; Chand S; Dixit VV
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():108-118. PubMed ID: 31150917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance.
    Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Young Novice Drivers' Cognitive Distraction Detection: Comparing Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Model of Vehicle Control Behavior.
    Xue Q; Wang X; Li Y; Guo W
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.
    Li X; Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Apr; 138():105486. PubMed ID: 32109686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 28095026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smartwatches are more distracting than mobile phones while driving: Results from an experimental study.
    Brodeur M; Ruer P; Léger PM; Sénécal S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105846. PubMed ID: 33181456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural equation model analysis for the evaluation of overall driving performance: A driving simulator study focusing on driver distraction.
    Papantoniou P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 29087738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What drives technology-based distractions? A structural equation model on social-psychological factors of technology-based driver distraction engagement.
    Chen HY; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jun; 91():166-74. PubMed ID: 26994371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.