BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36078716)

  • 1. Evaluation of Body Composition in CrossFit
    Menargues-Ramírez R; Sospedra I; Holway F; Hurtado-Sánchez JA; Martínez-Sanz JM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0283910. PubMed ID: 38015875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Somatotype and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis of Italian CrossFit® practitioners.
    Cebrián-Ponce Á; Serafini S; Petri C; Carrasco-Marginet M; Izzicupo P; Mascherini G
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(8):e29139. PubMed ID: 38655297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supplementation of caffeine and sodium bicarbonate together could not improve performance and performance-related factors in CrossFit participants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Ziyaiyan A; Shabkhiz F; Hofmeister M
    J Int Soc Sports Nutr; 2023 Dec; 20(1):2206390. PubMed ID: 37151086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit
    Peña J; Moreno-Doutres D; Peña I; Chulvi-Medrano I; Ortegón A; Aguilera-Castells J; Buscà B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33916215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.
    Storey A; Smith HK
    Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 42(9):769-90. PubMed ID: 22873835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?
    Butcher SJ; Neyedly TJ; Horvey KJ; Benko CR
    Open Access J Sports Med; 2015; 6():241-7. PubMed ID: 26261428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit
    Leitão L; Dias M; Campos Y; Vieira JG; Sant'Ana L; Telles LG; Tavares C; Mazini M; Novaes J; Vianna J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33921538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of 6 Weeks of
    Fernández-Lázaro D; Mielgo-Ayuso J; Del Valle Soto M; Adams DP; González-Bernal JJ; Seco-Calvo J
    Nutrients; 2021 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34836225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Analysis of Sport-Specific Pain Symptoms through Inter-Individual Training Differences in CrossFit.
    Bernstorff MA; Schumann N; Maai N; Schildhauer TA; Königshausen M
    Sports (Basel); 2021 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 34069604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common Orthopaedic Injuries in CrossFit Athletes.
    Shim SS; Confino JE; Vance DD
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 31(11):557-564. PubMed ID: 37155727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players.
    Bayios IA; Bergeles NK; Apostolidis NG; Noutsos KS; Koskolou MD
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2006 Jun; 46(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 16823358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes.
    D'Hulst G; Hodžić D; Leuenberger R; Arnet J; Westerhuis E; Roth R; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Knaier R; Wagner J
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2024 Jun; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38849121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived demands and postexercise physical dysfunction in CrossFit® compared to an ACSM based training session.
    Drum SN; Bellovary BN; Jensen RL; Moore MT; Donath L
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 May; 57(5):604-609. PubMed ID: 26954573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute Caffeine Supplementation Does Not Improve Performance in Trained CrossFit
    Stein JA; Ramirez M; Heinrich KM
    Sports (Basel); 2020 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 32340121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CrossFit®: Injury prevalence and main risk factors.
    da Costa TS; Louzada CTN; Miyashita GK; da Silva PHJ; Sungaila HYF; Lara PHS; Pochini AC; Ejnisman B; Cohen M; Arliani GG
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2019; 74():e1402. PubMed ID: 31778434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Systematic Review of CrossFit® Workouts and Dietary and Supplementation Interventions to Guide Nutritional Strategies and Future Research in CrossFit®.
    de Souza RAS; da Silva AG; de Souza MF; Souza LKF; Roschel H; da Silva SF; Saunders B
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2021 Mar; 31(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 33513565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normative Scores for CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    Sports (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 36828309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.
    Martínez-Gómez R; Valenzuela PL; Alejo LB; Gil-Cabrera J; Montalvo-Pérez A; Talavera E; Lucia A; Moral-González S; Barranco-Gil D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32456306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of a CrossFit
    Meier N; Rabel S; Schmidt A
    Sports (Basel); 2021 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 34199523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.