These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36081260)

  • 1. On the integration of LiDAR and field data for riparian biomass estimation.
    Latella M; Raimondo T; Belcore E; Salerno L; Camporeale C
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 322():116046. PubMed ID: 36081260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-temporal monitoring of a regional riparian buffer network (>12,000 km) with LiDAR and photogrammetric point clouds.
    Michez A; Piégay H; Lejeune P; Claessens H
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 202(Pt 2):424-436. PubMed ID: 28242116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in hybrid poplar buffers, herbaceous buffers and natural woodlots in the riparian zone on agricultural land.
    Fortier J; Truax B; Gagnon D; Lambert F
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():333-45. PubMed ID: 25753395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual Tree Segmentation Method Based on Mobile Backpack LiDAR Point Clouds.
    Comesaña-Cebral L; Martínez-Sánchez J; Lorenzo H; Arias P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Pools in Boreal Forests: The Case for Airborne Lidar.
    Kristensen T; Næsset E; Ohlson M; Bolstad PV; Kolka R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138450. PubMed ID: 26426532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advancing Fine Branch Biomass Estimation with Lidar and Structural Models.
    Millan M; Bonnet A; Dauzat J; Vezy R
    Ann Bot; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting shrub encroachment in seminatural grasslands using UAS LiDAR.
    Madsen B; Treier UA; Zlinszky A; Lucieer A; Normand S
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(11):4876-4902. PubMed ID: 32551068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR.
    Brede B; Lau A; Bartholomeus HM; Kooistra L
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Oct; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 29039755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving representation of riparian vegetation shading in a regional stream temperature model using LiDAR data.
    Loicq P; Moatar F; Jullian Y; Dugdale SJ; Hannah DM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 624():480-490. PubMed ID: 29268220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of vegetation structure on lidar-derived canopy height and fractional cover in forested riparian buffers during leaf-off and leaf-on conditions.
    Wasser L; Day R; Chasmer L; Taylor A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54776. PubMed ID: 23382966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling and monitoring riparian buffer zones using LiDAR data in South Carolina.
    Akturk E; Post C; Mikhailova EA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 May; 192(6):350. PubMed ID: 32388638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-destructive estimation of field maize biomass using terrestrial lidar: an evaluation from plot level to individual leaf level.
    Jin S; Su Y; Song S; Xu K; Hu T; Yang Q; Wu F; Xu G; Ma Q; Guan H; Pang S; Li Y; Guo Q
    Plant Methods; 2020; 16():69. PubMed ID: 32435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harvesting tree biomass at the stand level to assess the accuracy of field and airborne biomass estimation in savannas.
    Colgan MS; Asner GP; Swemmer T
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1170-84. PubMed ID: 23967584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Estimating individual tree aboveground biomass of the mid-subtropical forest using airborne LiDAR technology].
    Liu F; Tan C; Lei PF
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 Nov; 25(11):3229-36. PubMed ID: 25898621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of LiDAR point density, sampling size and height threshold on estimation accuracy of crop biophysical parameters.
    Luo S; Chen JM; Wang C; Xi X; Zeng H; Peng D; Li D
    Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(11):11578-93. PubMed ID: 27410085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tropical tree size-frequency distributions from airborne lidar.
    Ferraz A; Saatchi SS; Longo M; Clark DB
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Oct; 30(7):e02154. PubMed ID: 32347996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tree-centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data.
    Dalponte M; Coomes DA
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2016 Oct; 7(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 28008347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving river hydromorphological assessment through better integration of riparian vegetation: Scientific evidence and guidelines.
    González Del Tánago M; Martínez-Fernández V; Aguiar FC; Bertoldi W; Dufour S; García de Jalón D; Garófano-Gómez V; Mandzukovski D; Rodríguez-González PM
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112730. PubMed ID: 33991830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple method for direct crown base height estimation of individual conifer trees using airborne LiDAR data.
    Luo L; Zhai Q; Su Y; Ma Q; Kelly M; Guo Q
    Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):A562-A578. PubMed ID: 29801269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico.
    Urbazaev M; Thiel C; Cremer F; Dubayah R; Migliavacca M; Reichstein M; Schmullius C
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Feb; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 29468474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.