182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36083223)
1. Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients.
Zhang Y; Alshaikhi J; Amos RA; Tan W; Anaya VM; Pang Y; Royle G; Bär E
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7683-7693. PubMed ID: 36083223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Including anatomical variations in robust optimization for head and neck proton therapy can reduce the need of adaptation.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Feb; 131():127-134. PubMed ID: 30773179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-fraction robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy in the post-operative treatment of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.
Hague C; Aznar M; Dong L; Fotouhi-Ghiam A; Lee LW; Li T; Lin A; Lowe M; Lukens JN; McPartlin A; O'Reilly S; Slevin N; Swisher-Mcclure S; Thomson D; Van Herk M; West C; Zou W; Teo BK
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190638. PubMed ID: 31845816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.
Rojo-Santiago J; Korevaar E; Perkó Z; Both S; Habraken SJM; Hoogeman MS
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Sep; 186():109729. PubMed ID: 37301261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.
Huiskes M; Kong W; Oud M; Crama K; Rasch C; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Astreinidou E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Jul; 119(3):968-977. PubMed ID: 38284961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A probability model for anatomical robust optimisation in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
Zhang Y; Alshaikhi J; Tan W; Royle G; Bär E
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Dec; 68(1):. PubMed ID: 36562611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bobić M; Lalonde A; Sharp GC; Grassberger C; Verburg JM; Winey BA; Lomax AJ; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):. PubMed ID: 33503592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Anatomical Position Errors on Dose Distribution in Head and Neck Radiotherapy and Robust Image Registration Against Anatomical Changes.
Hirotaki K; Tomizawa K; Moriya S; Ito M; Sakae T
Anticancer Res; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1827-1834. PubMed ID: 36974799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
