These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36083584)

  • 41. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.
    Choi J; Jun JH; Kang BK; Kim KH; Lee MS
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():429. PubMed ID: 25373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals.
    To MJ; Jones J; Emara M; Jadad AR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e84779. PubMed ID: 24391973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.
    Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.
    Hopewell S; Collins GS; Boutron I; Yu LM; Cook J; Shanyinde M; Wharton R; Shamseer L; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4145. PubMed ID: 24986891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bruce R; Chauvin A; Trinquart L; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2016 Jun; 14(1):85. PubMed ID: 27287500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals.
    Rosenthal R; Dwan K
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 23478520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research.
    Kapadia MZ; Askie L; Hartling L; Contopoulos-Ioannidis D; Bhutta ZA; Soll R; Moher D; Offringa M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010270. PubMed ID: 27091820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials.
    Conroy EJ; Arch B; Harman NL; Lane JA; Lewis SC; Norrie J; Sydes MR; Gamble C
    Trials; 2017 Dec; 18(1):590. PubMed ID: 29221458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in clinical trials published in nursing science journals: a descriptive study.
    Gray R; Brasier C; Zirnsak TM; Ng AH
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Dec; 7(1):88. PubMed ID: 34906260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
    Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
    Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conflicts of interest in randomized controlled trials reported in neurosurgical journals.
    Staartjes VE; Klukowska AM; Sorba EL; Schröder ML
    J Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 133(3):855-864. PubMed ID: 31419788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Systematic review of outcomes and endpoints in acute migraine clinical trials.
    Houts CR; McGinley JS; Nishida TK; Buse DC; Wirth RJ; Dodick DW; Goadsby PJ; Lipton RB
    Headache; 2021 Feb; 61(2):263-275. PubMed ID: 33611818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
    Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review.
    Fergusson D; Monfaredi Z; Pussegoda K; Garritty C; Lyddiatt A; Shea B; Duffett L; Ghannad M; Montroy J; Murad MH; Pratt M; Rader T; Shorr R; Yazdi F
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():17. PubMed ID: 29796308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in cardiovascular journals.
    Sims MT; Bowers AM; Fernan JM; Dormire KD; Herrington JM; Vassar M
    Heart; 2018 May; 104(9):753-759. PubMed ID: 29092915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.
    Khan MS; Shaikh A; Ochani RK; Akhtar T; Fatima K; Khan SU; Mookadam F; Murad MH; Figueredo VM; Doukky R; Krasuski RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 May; 12(5):e005260. PubMed ID: 31030545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factors that influence clinical trial participation by patients with cancer in Australia: a scoping review protocol.
    You KH; Lwin Z; Ahern E; Wyld D; Roberts N
    BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e057675. PubMed ID: 35387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.