297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36084124)
1. Quantitative prediction of ensemble dynamics, shapes and contact propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Yu L; Brüschweiler R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1010036. PubMed ID: 36084124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Residual Structures and Transient Long-Range Interactions of p53 Transactivation Domain: Assessment of Explicit Solvent Protein Force Fields.
Liu X; Chen J
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4708-4720. PubMed ID: 31241933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modulation of the disordered conformational ensembles of the p53 transactivation domain by cancer-associated mutations.
Ganguly D; Chen J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Apr; 11(4):e1004247. PubMed ID: 25897952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generation of the configurational ensemble of an intrinsically disordered protein from unbiased molecular dynamics simulation.
Shrestha UR; Juneja P; Zhang Q; Gurumoorthy V; Borreguero JM; Urban V; Cheng X; Pingali SV; Smith JC; O'Neill HM; Petridis L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(41):20446-20452. PubMed ID: 31548393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins from NMR chemical shifts.
Kragelj J; Ozenne V; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
Chemphyschem; 2013 Sep; 14(13):3034-45. PubMed ID: 23794453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generating Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles from a Database of Ramachandran Space Pair Residue Probabilities Using a Markov Chain.
Cukier RI
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(39):9087-9101. PubMed ID: 30204435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phosphorylation Regulates the Bound Structure of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein: The p53-TAZ2 Case.
Ithuralde RE; Turjanski AG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144284. PubMed ID: 26742101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phanto-IDP: compact model for precise intrinsically disordered protein backbone generation and enhanced sampling.
Zhu J; Li Z; Tong H; Lu Z; Zhang N; Wei T; Chen HF
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38018910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Rahman MU; Rehman AU; Liu H; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4912-4923. PubMed ID: 32816485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conformational propensities and dynamics of a βγ-crystallin, an intrinsically disordered protein.
Patel S; Ramanujam V; Srivastava AK; Chary KV
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Jul; 16(25):12703-18. PubMed ID: 24671380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Full structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations.
Shrestha UR; Smith JC; Petridis L
Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):243. PubMed ID: 33623120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hierarchical Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins at Atomic Resolution in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Pietrek LM; Stelzl LS; Hummer G
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jan; 16(1):725-737. PubMed ID: 31809054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced Sampling Methods for Multiscale Simulation of Disordered Proteins and Dynamic Interactions.
Gong X; Zhang Y; Chen J
Biomolecules; 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34680048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.
Rozentur-Shkop E; Goobes G; Chill JH
J Biomol NMR; 2016 Dec; 66(4):243-257. PubMed ID: 27844185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiscale ensemble modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: p53 N-terminal domain.
Terakawa T; Takada S
Biophys J; 2011 Sep; 101(6):1450-8. PubMed ID: 21943426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WASCO: A Wasserstein-based Statistical Tool to Compare Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
González-Delgado J; Sagar A; Zanon C; Lindorff-Larsen K; Bernadó P; Neuvial P; Cortés J
J Mol Biol; 2023 Jul; 435(14):168053. PubMed ID: 36934808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Sequence Composition, Patterning and Hydrodynamics on the Conformation and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Vovk A; Zilman A
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36674958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ensemble Calculation for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using NMR Parameters.
Kragelj J; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 870():123-47. PubMed ID: 26387101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
