These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36085032)

  • 1. Conjoint analyses of patients' preferences for primary care: a systematic review.
    Lim AH; Ng SW; Teh XR; Ong SM; Sivasampu S; Lim KK
    BMC Prim Care; 2022 Sep; 23(1):234. PubMed ID: 36085032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
    Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
    Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.
    Kleij KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):476. PubMed ID: 28697796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.
    Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conjoint Analysis of Telemedicine Preferences for Hypertension Management Among Adult Patients.
    Tierney AA; Brown TT; Aguilera A; Shortell SM; Rodriguez HP
    Telemed J E Health; 2024 Mar; 30(3):692-704. PubMed ID: 37843962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.
    Barber S; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Bekker H; Meads D
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Oct; 3(4):326-335. PubMed ID: 30931788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of understanding patient and physician preferences for psoriasis treatment characteristics: a systematic review of discrete-choice experiments.
    Sain N; Willems D; Charokopou M; Hiligsmann M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1257-1275. PubMed ID: 32468865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Bien DR; Danner M; Vennedey V; Civello D; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
    Patient; 2017 Oct; 10(5):553-565. PubMed ID: 28364387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.
    Diks ME; Hiligsmann M; van der Putten IM
    BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 21(1):879. PubMed ID: 34454441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Discrete Choice Experiment to Examine the Preferences of Patients With Cancer and Their Willingness to Pay for Different Types of Health Care Appointments.
    Wong SF; Norman R; Dunning TL; Ashley DM; Khasraw M; Hayes TM; Collins I; Lorgelly PK
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2016 Mar; 14(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26957617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.
    Zhou M; Thayer WM; Bridges JFP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Feb; 36(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 28975582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
    Hall R; Medina-Lara A; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
    Patient; 2022 May; 15(3):269-285. PubMed ID: 34671946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding community-dwelling older adults' preferences for home- and community-based services: A conjoint analysis.
    Chen S; Yang J; Ma B; Meng J; Chen Y; Ma T; Zhang X; Wang Y; Huang Y; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Lu Q
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Apr; 152():104699. PubMed ID: 38308935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.