These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36085923)
41. Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients. Jarrassé N; Proietti T; Crocher V; Robertson J; Sahbani A; Morel G; Roby-Brami A Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():947. PubMed ID: 25520638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Hand robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: A systematic review on the feasibility and effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation]. Hernández Echarren A; Sánchez Cabeza Á Rehabilitacion (Madr); 2023; 57(1):100758. PubMed ID: 36319483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Robotic systems for upper-limb rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a SWOT analysis and the synergies with virtual and augmented environments. Albanese GA; Bucchieri A; Podda J; Tacchino A; Buccelli S; De Momi E; Laffranchi M; Mannella K; Holmes MWR; Zenzeri J; De Michieli L; Brichetto G; Barresi G Front Robot AI; 2024; 11():1335147. PubMed ID: 38638271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Moving toward Soft Robotics: A Decade Review of the Design of Hand Exoskeletons. Shahid T; Gouwanda D; Nurzaman SG; Gopalai AA Biomimetics (Basel); 2018 Jul; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31105239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs. Wang Y; Li W; Togo S; Yokoi H; Jiang Y Cyborg Bionic Syst; 2021; 2021():9817487. PubMed ID: 36285140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Design Criteria of Soft Exogloves for Hand Rehabilitation-Assistance Tasks. Dávila-Vilchis JM; Ávila-Vilchis JC; Vilchis-González AH; Laz-Avilés Appl Bionics Biomech; 2020; 2020():2724783. PubMed ID: 32802156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Design of a 6-DoF Cost-effective Differential-drive based Robotic system for Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation. Jonna P; Rao M Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1423-1427. PubMed ID: 36085923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Robotic quantification of upper extremity loss of independent joint control or flexion synergy in individuals with hemiparetic stroke: a review of paradigms addressing the effects of shoulder abduction loading. Ellis MD; Lan Y; Yao J; Dewald JP J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Oct; 13(1):95. PubMed ID: 27794362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robotic arm use for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee BO; Saragih ID; Batubara SO Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2023 May; 39(5):435-445. PubMed ID: 36999894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective. Bishop L; Stein J NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A scoping review of design requirements for a home-based upper limb rehabilitation robot for stroke. Li L; Fu Q; Tyson S; Preston N; Weightman A Top Stroke Rehabil; 2022 Sep; 29(6):449-463. PubMed ID: 34281494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]