153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36086091)
1. Cross-Channel Impedance Measurement for Monitoring Implanted Electrodes.
Earley EJ; Mastinu E; Ortiz-Catalan M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():4880-4883. PubMed ID: 36086091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients.
Tykocinski M; Cohen LT; Cowan RS
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):948-56. PubMed ID: 16151342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impedance development after implantation of hybrid-L24 cochlear implant electrodes.
Konrad S; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Paasche G
Int J Audiol; 2023 Dec; 62(12):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 36193989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrode migration after cochlear implantation.
von Mitzlaff C; Dalbert A; Winklhofer S; Veraguth D; Huber A; Röösli C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Mar; 22(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 33148136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.
Sunwoo W; Jeon HW; Choi BY
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22809. PubMed ID: 34815432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance measurements with the CI24M cochlear implant for a child with Mondini dysplasia.
French ML
Br J Audiol; 1999 Feb; 33(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10219723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impedance measures for a better understanding of the electrical stimulation of the inner ear.
Mesnildrey Q; Macherey O; Herzog P; Venail F
J Neural Eng; 2019 Feb; 16(1):016023. PubMed ID: 30523898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants.
Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes in Cochlear Implants with Electric Field Imaging/Transimpedance Measurements: A Human Cadaver Study.
de Rijk SR; Tam YC; Carlyon RP; Bance ML
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1196-1207. PubMed ID: 31923041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Observation on the change of electrode impedance and THR/MCL values in 20 cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ cochlear implant].
Wu W; Jia H; Li Y; Tang Z; Huang Q; Yang J; Mei L; Haung Z; Wu H
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1238-42. PubMed ID: 24616980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion Depth.
Aebischer P; Meyer S; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):545-555. PubMed ID: 32746052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Research progress on the relationship between electrode position and electrode impedance of artificial cochlea].
Huang JC; Chen P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1221-1224. PubMed ID: 31914282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.
Newbold C; Mergen S; Richardson R; Seligman P; Millard R; Cowan R; Shepherd R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 23998484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of electrophysiological parameters between perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes in paediatric cochlear implant users.
Zarowski A; Molisz A; Mylanus EAM; Miserus JHM; Leblans M; van Dinther J; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 277(10):2693-2699. PubMed ID: 32342198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
