135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36086767)
1. A study of different minimum segment area parameters on automatic IMRT plans for cervical cancer using Pinnacle3 9.10 TPS.
Sun H; Wang N; Wang X; Huang G; Chang Y; Liu Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e29290. PubMed ID: 36086767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of minimum segment width parameter on VMAT plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical cancer using Monaco TPS.
Wang Y; Chen L; Zhu F; Guo W; Zhang D; Sun W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):609-615. PubMed ID: 30058257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus rapid arc in gynecological malignancies: Dose beyond planning target volume, precisely 5Gy volume.
Sidhu MS; Singh K; Sood S; Aggarwal R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(5):1267-1271. PubMed ID: 37787294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT.
Calvo OI; Gutiérrez AN; Stathakis S; Esquivel C; Papanikolaou N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 May; 13(3):3751. PubMed ID: 22584174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.
Pasler M; Georg D; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):792-8. PubMed ID: 22127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network.
Jihong C; Penggang B; Xiuchun Z; Kaiqiang C; Wenjuan C; Yitao D; Jiewei Q; Kerun Q; Jing Z; Tianming W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820957002. PubMed ID: 33016230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Automated Treatment Plan Quality Control Tool for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using a Voxel-Weighting Factor-Based Re-Optimization Algorithm.
Song T; Li N; Zarepisheh M; Li Y; Gautier Q; Zhou L; Mell L; Jiang S; Cerviño L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149273. PubMed ID: 26930204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of fixed-jaw IMRT and tangential partial-VMAT radiotherapy plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer irradiation based on a dosimetric study.
Huang JH; Wu XX; Lin X; Shi JT; Ma YJ; Duan S; Huang XB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):31-41. PubMed ID: 31483573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of IMRT planning parameters on planning efficiency, delivery efficiency, and plan quality.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Yan G; Kahler D; Gopal A; Amdur R; Liu C
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061704. PubMed ID: 23718583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Qiu J; Lv B; Fu M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhuo W
Head Neck; 2017 Dec; 39(12):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 28963789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac Dose Control and Optimization Strategy for Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy With Non-Uniform VMAT Technology.
Qiu J; Zhang S; Lv B; Zheng X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211053752. PubMed ID: 34806481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bao Z; Wang D; Chen S; Chen M; Jiang D; Yang C; Liu H; Dai J; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):118. PubMed ID: 31378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
