These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36087795)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging.
    Weir-McCall JR; Debruyn E; Harris S; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Gleeson FV; Gilbert FJ;
    Chest; 2023 Feb; 163(2):444-454. PubMed ID: 36087795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT compared with positron emission tomography CT to characterise solitary pulmonary nodules: the SPUtNIk diagnostic accuracy study and economic modelling.
    Gilbert FJ; Harris S; Miles KA; Weir-McCall JR; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Sinclair D; Shah A; Eaton R; Clegg A; Benedetto V; Hill JE; Cook A; Tzelis D; Vale L; Brindle L; Madden J; Cozens K; Little LA; Eichhorst K; Moate P; McClement C; Peebles C; Banerjee A; Han S; Poon FW; Groves AM; Kurban L; Frew AJ; Callister ME; Crosbie P; Gleeson FV; Karunasaagarar K; Kankam O; George S
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Mar; 26(17):1-180. PubMed ID: 35289267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Gilbert FJ; Harris S; Miles KA; Weir-McCall JR; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Sinclair D; Shah A; Eaton R; Jones J; Clegg A; Benedetto V; Hill J; Cook A; Tzelis D; Vale L; Brindle L; Madden J; Cozens K; Little L; Eichhorst K; Moate P; McClement C; Peebles C; Banerjee A; Han S; Poon FW; Groves AM; Kurban L; Frew A; Callister MEJ; Crosbie PA; Gleeson FV; Karunasaagarar K; Kankam O; George S
    Thorax; 2022 Oct; 77(10):988-996. PubMed ID: 34887348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Weir-McCall JR; Joyce S; Clegg A; MacKay JW; Baxter G; Dendl LM; Rintoul RC; Qureshi NR; Miles K; Gilbert FJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3310-3323. PubMed ID: 32060716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of different size of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Tang K; Wang L; Lin J; Zheng X; Wu Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14813. PubMed ID: 30882661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients.
    Schillaci O; Travascio L; Bolacchi F; Calabria F; Bruni C; Cicciò C; Guazzaroni M; Orlacchio A; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2009 Sep; 114(6):890-906. PubMed ID: 19579015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Seki S; Tsubakimoto M; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):563-75. PubMed ID: 25203128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
    Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: A validation study of four prediction models.
    Al-Ameri A; Malhotra P; Thygesen H; Plant PK; Vaidyanathan S; Karthik S; Scarsbrook A; Callister ME
    Lung Cancer; 2015 Jul; 89(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 25864782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solitary pulmonary nodule: Comparison of quantitative capability for differentiation and management among dynamic CE-perfusion MRI at 3 T system, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and FDG-PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Fujisawa Y; Yui M; Takenaka D; Koyama H; Sugihara N; Yoshikawa T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():22-30. PubMed ID: 31084755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and chest thin-layer high-resolution computed tomography for evaluation of pulmonary nodules: Correlation with imaging features, maximum standardized uptake value, and pathology.
    Hou S; Lin X; Wang S; Shen Y; Meng Z; Jia Q; Tan J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(31):e11640. PubMed ID: 30075545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solitary pulmonary nodules: morphological and metabolic characterisation by FDG-PET-MDCT.
    Orlacchio A; Schillaci O; Antonelli L; D'Urso S; Sergiacomi G; Nicolì P; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 17361379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of solitary pulmonary nodule size on qualitative and quantitative assessment using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: the SPUTNIK trial.
    Weir-McCall JR; Harris S; Miles KA; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Cheow HK; Gilbert FJ;
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 May; 48(5):1560-1569. PubMed ID: 33130961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Dabrowska M; Krenke R; Korczynski P; Maskey-Warzechowska M; Zukowska M; Kunikowska J; Orłowski T; Chazan R
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e666. PubMed ID: 25881842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LUCIS: lung cancer imaging studies.
    Harders SW
    Dan Med J; 2012 Nov; 59(11):B4542. PubMed ID: 23171752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of CT dose reduction on AI-driven malignancy estimation of incidental pulmonary nodules.
    Peters AA; Solomon JB; von Stackelberg O; Samei E; Alsaihati N; Valenzuela W; Debic M; Heidt C; Huber AT; Christe A; Heverhagen JT; Kauczor HU; Heussel CP; Ebner L; Wielpütz MO
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3444-3452. PubMed ID: 37870625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy.
    Cronin P; Dwamena BA; Kelly AM; Carlos RC
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 18235105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using neighborhood gray tone difference matrix texture features on dual time point PET/CT images to differentiate malignant from benign FDG-avid solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Chen S; Harmon S; Perk T; Li X; Chen M; Li Y; Jeraj R
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Aug; 19(1):56. PubMed ID: 31420006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT.
    Christensen JA; Nathan MA; Mullan BP; Hartman TE; Swensen SJ; Lowe VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17056930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial intelligence for detecting small FDG-positive lung nodules in digital PET/CT: impact of image reconstructions on diagnostic performance.
    Schwyzer M; Martini K; Benz DC; Burger IA; Ferraro DA; Kudura K; Treyer V; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW; Messerli M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2031-2040. PubMed ID: 31822970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.