These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36088303)

  • 1. Comparing suction rates of novel DuCanto catheter against Yankauer and standard suction catheter using liquids of different viscosity-a technical simulation.
    Finke SR; Schroeder DC; Ecker H; Böttiger BW; Herff H; Wetsch WA
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):285. PubMed ID: 36088303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Suction Rates Between a Standard Yankauer, a Commercial Large-Bore Suction Device, and a Makeshift Large-Bore Suction Device.
    Nikolla DA; King B; Heslin A; Carlson JN
    J Emerg Med; 2021 Sep; 61(3):265-270. PubMed ID: 34006421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Effectiveness of a Novel Suction Set-up Using an Adult Endotracheal Tube Connected to a Meconium Aspirator vs. a Traditional Yankauer Suction Instrument.
    Kei J; Mebust DP
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 52(4):433-437. PubMed ID: 27751699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of neonatal suction catheters using simulated 'pea soup' meconium.
    Zareen Z; Hawkes CP; Krickan ER; Dempsey EM; Ryan CA
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2013 May; 98(3):F241-3. PubMed ID: 23580703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Novel Intubation Technique: Bougie Introduction Via Ducanto Suction Catheter.
    Cochran-Caggiano N; Holliday J; Howard C
    J Emerg Med; 2024 Feb; 66(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 38296765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of suction catheter tip design on tracheobronchial trauma and fluid aspiration efficiency.
    Link WJ; Spaeth EE; Wahle WM; Penny W; Glover JL
    Anesth Analg; 1976; 55(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 943994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of Nasotracheal Suctioning With Curved Edge Catheter Versus Conventional Suction Catheter in Critically Ill Subjects: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Grigoriadis KΕ; Angouras DC; Flevari A; Xathos T
    Respir Care; 2015 Dec; 60(12):1826-33. PubMed ID: 26487746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.
    Singh NC; Kissoon N; Frewen T; Tiffin N
    Clin Intensive Care; 1991; 2(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endotracheal suctioning: from principles to practice.
    Morrow BM; Futter MJ; Argent AC
    Intensive Care Med; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 15034648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of endotracheal suction catheters.
    Shah S; Fung K; Brim S; Rubin BK
    Chest; 2005 Nov; 128(5):3699-704. PubMed ID: 16304336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Indications for the use of closed endotracheal suction. Artificial respiration with high positive end-expiratory pressure].
    Weitl J; Bettstetter H
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jun; 43(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8048770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory test of a visual sputum suctioning system.
    Lv J; Wu J; Guo R; Liu X; Yan B; Deng H
    Respir Care; 2013 Oct; 58(10):1637-42. PubMed ID: 23533294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of loss in lung volume with open versus in-line catheter endotracheal suctioning.
    Choong K; Chatrkaw P; Frndova H; Cox PN
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2003 Jan; 4(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 12656547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [ S-shaped suction catheter for intraoperative intermaxillary fixation].
    Sugiyama K; Saitoh Y; Kohjitani A
    Masui; 2009 Jun; 58(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19522279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of suction rates between a standard Yankauer and make-shift large bore suction catheters using a meconium aspirator and various sized endotracheal tubes.
    Nikolla DA; Heslin A; King B; Carlson JN
    J Clin Anesth; 2021 Sep; 72():110262. PubMed ID: 33839435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suction catheter size: an assessment and comparison of 3 different calculation methods.
    Russian CJ; Gonzales JF; Henry NR
    Respir Care; 2014 Jan; 59(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23777657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of applying positive pressure with or without endotracheal suctioning during extubation: a laboratory study.
    Andreu MF; Salvati IG; Donnianni MC; Ibañez B; Cotignola M; Bezzi M
    Respir Care; 2014 Dec; 59(12):1905-11. PubMed ID: 25425709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.
    Cordero L; Sananes M; Ayers LW
    Respir Care; 2001 Aug; 46(8):783-8. PubMed ID: 11463368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suctioning via the tube during endotracheal intubation in a model of severe upper airway haemorrhage: is there an advantage vs. suctioning with a separate catheter?
    Mitterlechner T; Wipp A; Paal P; Strasak AM; Wenzel V; Felbinger TW; Schmittinger CA
    Resuscitation; 2011 Jun; 82(6):740-2. PubMed ID: 21396763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep versus shallow suction of endotracheal tubes in ventilated neonates and young infants.
    Spence K; Gillies D; Waterworth L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (3):CD003309. PubMed ID: 12917961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.