109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36088612)
21. Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data.
Chen ST; Wu MC; Hsu TC; Yen DW; Chang CN; Hsu WT; Wang CC; Lee M; Liu SH; Lee CC;
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 29284067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation.
Park SY; Lee SM; Park JS; Kim HJ; Choi GS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jul; 64(7):812-821. PubMed ID: 33833141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients].
Gao GM; Chen L; Tang HC; Zhu WQ; Huang ZX; Wang DD; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 24(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 33461255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study.
Asklid D; Gerjy R; Hjern F; Pekkari K; Gustafsson UO
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 21(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30428153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in rectal cancer.
Keller DS; Champagne BJ; Reynolds HL; Stein SL; Delaney CP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):564-9. PubMed ID: 24819095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic transanal minimally invasive surgery (L-TAMIS) versus robotic TAMIS (R-TAMIS): short-term outcomes and costs of a comparative study.
Lee SG; Russ AJ; Casillas MA
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 30547391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic colorectal surgery using the Senhance
Samalavicius NE; Dulskas A; Janusonis V; Klimasauskiene V; Eismontas V; Deduchovas O; Janusonis T; Markelis R; Smolskas E
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jun; 26(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 35305181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea.
Baek SJ; Kim SH; Cho JS; Shin JW; Kim J
World J Surg; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2722-9. PubMed ID: 22855217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Low Rectal Cancers.
Bedirli A; Salman B; Yuksel O
JSLS; 2016; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 27081292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.
Ahmed J; Cao H; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28644545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Short-term outcome in robotic vs laparoscopic and open rectal tumor surgery within an ERAS protocol: a retrospective cohort study from the Swedish ERAS database.
Asklid D; Ljungqvist O; Xu Y; Gustafsson UO
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):2006-2017. PubMed ID: 33856528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Klajner S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14359-70. PubMed ID: 25339823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
