104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36089473)
21. Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning.
Nishi H; Oishi N; Ishii A; Ono I; Ogura T; Sunohara T; Chihara H; Fukumitsu R; Okawa M; Yamana N; Imamura H; Sadamasa N; Hatano T; Nakahara I; Sakai N; Miyamoto S
Stroke; 2019 Sep; 50(9):2379-2388. PubMed ID: 31409267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the risk of dengue severity using demographic information and laboratory test results with machine learning.
Huang SW; Tsai HP; Hung SJ; Ko WC; Wang JR
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2020 Dec; 14(12):e0008960. PubMed ID: 33362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Examining the Ability of Artificial Neural Networks Machine Learning Models to Accurately Predict Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion.
Kim JS; Merrill RK; Arvind V; Kaji D; Pasik SD; Nwachukwu CC; Vargas L; Osman NS; Oermann EK; Caridi JM; Cho SK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jun; 43(12):853-860. PubMed ID: 29016439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive model for the 5-year survival status of osteosarcoma patients based on the SEER database and XGBoost algorithm.
Jiang J; Pan H; Li M; Qian B; Lin X; Fan S
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5542. PubMed ID: 33692453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision: A Machine Learning Analysis Utilizing the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register.
Martin RK; Wastvedt S; Pareek A; Persson A; Visnes H; Fenstad AM; Moatshe G; Wolfson J; Engebretsen L
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Jan; 104(2):145-153. PubMed ID: 34662318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay
Wu JY; Lin Y; Lin K; Hu YH; Kong GL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Dec; 53(6):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 34916699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive Abilities of Machine Learning Techniques May Be Limited by Dataset Characteristics: Insights From the UNOS Database.
Miller PE; Pawar S; Vaccaro B; McCullough M; Rao P; Ghosh R; Warier P; Desai NR; Ahmad T
J Card Fail; 2019 Jun; 25(6):479-483. PubMed ID: 30738152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning and radiomic phenotyping of lower grade gliomas: improving survival prediction.
Choi YS; Ahn SS; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim EH; Kim SH; Jain R; Lee SK
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3834-3842. PubMed ID: 32162004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integrating additional factors into the TNM staging for cutaneous melanoma by machine learning.
Yang CQ; Wang H; Liu Z; Hueman MT; Bhaskaran A; Henson DE; Sheng L; Chen D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257949. PubMed ID: 34591891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Web-based nomograms for predicting the prognosis of adolescent and young adult skin melanoma, a large population-based real-world analysis.
Yang C; Liao F; Cao L
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Nov; 9(11):7103-7112. PubMed ID: 35117315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and Validation of a Novel Metabolic Signature-Based Prognostic Model for Uveal Melanoma.
Shi K; Li X; Zhang J; Sun X
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 May; 11(5):9. PubMed ID: 35536719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.
Awad A; Bader-El-Den M; McNicholas J; Briggs J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Dec; 108():185-195. PubMed ID: 29132626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of machine learning approaches to administrative claims data to predict clinical outcomes in medical and surgical patient populations.
MacKay EJ; Stubna MD; Chivers C; Draugelis ME; Hanson WJ; Desai ND; Groeneveld PW
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252585. PubMed ID: 34081720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting oral cavity cancer prognosis.
Adeoye J; Hui L; Koohi-Moghadam M; Tan JY; Choi SW; Thomson P
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jan; 157():104635. PubMed ID: 34800847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict gastrointestinal leak and venous thromboembolism after weight loss surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.
Nudel J; Bishara AM; de Geus SWL; Patil P; Srinivasan J; Hess DT; Woodson J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):182-191. PubMed ID: 31953733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of prognosis in elderly patients with sepsis based on machine learning (random survival forest).
Zhang L; Huang T; Xu F; Li S; Zheng S; Lyu J; Yin H
BMC Emerg Med; 2022 Feb; 22(1):26. PubMed ID: 35148680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?
El-Galaly A; Grazal C; Kappel A; Nielsen PT; Jensen SL; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2088-2101. PubMed ID: 32667760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting survival outcome of localized melanoma: an electronic prediction tool based on the AJCC Melanoma Database.
Soong SJ; Ding S; Coit D; Balch CM; Gershenwald JE; Thompson JF; Gimotty P;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):2006-14. PubMed ID: 20379784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An External-Validated Prediction Model to Predict Lung Metastasis among Osteosarcoma: A Multicenter Analysis Based on Machine Learning.
Li W; Liu W; Hussain Memon F; Wang B; Xu C; Dong S; Wang H; Hu Z; Quan X; Deng Y; Liu Q; Su S; Yin C
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():2220527. PubMed ID: 35571720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing the characteristics and predicting the survival of patients with head and neck melanoma versus body melanoma: a population-based study.
Ding Y; Jiang R; Chen Y; Jing J; Yang X; Wu X; Zhang X; Xu J; Xu P; LiuHuang SC; Lu Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):420. PubMed ID: 33863315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
