These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36089895)

  • 1. Assessment of gingival thickness in multi-ethnic subjects with different gingival pigmentation levels.
    Nik-Azis NM; Razali M; Goh V; Ahmad Shuhaimi NN; Mohd Nazrin NAS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jan; 50(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 36089895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness.
    Frost NA; Mealey BL; Jones AA; Huynh-Ba G
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1141-9. PubMed ID: 26110452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: A cross-sectional study.
    Kloukos D; Koukos G; Doulis I; Sculean A; Stavropoulos A; Katsaros C
    J Periodontol; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1300-1309. PubMed ID: 30043972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
    De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement.
    Kan JY; Morimoto T; Rungcharassaeng K; Roe P; Smith DH
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Jun; 30(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20386780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Das G; Ahmed AR; Suleman G; Lal A; Rana MH; Ahmed N; Arora S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Gingival thickness assessment of gingival recession teeth].
    Chen ZY; Zhong JS; Ouyang XY; Zhou SY; Xie Y; Lou XZ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Apr; 52(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 32306020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of gingival translucency at the mandibular incisors with two different probing systems. A cross sectional study.
    Kloukos D; Roccuzzo A; Staehli A; Koukos G; Sculean A; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(7):405. PubMed ID: 38942966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.
    Alves PHM; Alves TCLP; Pegoraro TA; Costa YM; Bonfante EA; de Almeida ALPF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 29350855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transgingival probing: a clinical gold standard for assessing gingival thickness.
    Kloukos D; Koukos G; Gkantidis N; Sculean A; Katsaros C; Stavropoulos A
    Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 33533238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method.
    Savitha B; Vandana KL
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(4):135-9. PubMed ID: 16761705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods.
    Aguilar-Duran L; Mir-Mari J; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 Jan; 25(1):e144-e149. PubMed ID: 31880279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different methods used in the classification of maxillary gingival phenotype: A diagnostic accuracy study.
    Guliyev R; Lutfioglu M; Keskiner I
    J Periodontal Res; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39135317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of gingival thickness in the maxillary anterior region using different techniques.
    Nisanci Yilmaz MN; Koseoglu Secgin C; Ozemre MO; İnonu E; Aslan S; Bulut S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6531-6538. PubMed ID: 35796801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.
    Manjunath RG; Rana A; Sarkar A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC66-9. PubMed ID: 26155566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions - a radiographic morphometric study.
    Stein JM; Lintel-Höping N; Hammächer C; Kasaj A; Tamm M; Hanisch O
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 40(12):1132-9. PubMed ID: 24102580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical efficacy of intraoral ultrasonography versus transgingival probing for measurement of gingival thickness in different gingival biotypes: a clinical trial.
    Alizad-Rahvar M; Safi Y; Kadkhodazadeh M; Ghomashi MP
    Head Face Med; 2024 Apr; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 38566169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gingival thickness threshold and probe visibility through soft tissue: a cross-sectional study.
    Kloukos D; Kalimeri E; Koukos G; Stähli A; Sculean A; Katsaros C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5155-5161. PubMed ID: 35503136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Preliminary study on gingival biotype by periodontal probing].
    Le D; Zhang H; Hu WJ; Liu DG
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 47(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 22490242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gingival phenotype classification by visual and probe visibility assessments: Relationship with thickness and probe design.
    Uysal BF; Köse T; Gürkan A
    J Periodontol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39119887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.