These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36089946)

  • 21. The effects of blockchain technology adoption on business ethics and social sustainability: evidence from the Middle East.
    Ronaghi MH; Mosakhani M
    Environ Dev Sustain; 2022; 24(5):6834-6859. PubMed ID: 34393620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental Regulations and Corporate Green Innovation in China: The Role of City Leaders' Promotion Pressure.
    Yang L; Zhang J; Zhang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of Digital Economy in Rebuilding and Sustaining the Space Governance Mechanisms.
    Cai C; Qiu R; Tu Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():828406. PubMed ID: 35126269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sustainable internal corporate social responsibility and solving the puzzles of performance sustainability among medium size manufacturing companies: An empirical approach.
    Sanusi FA; Johl SK
    Heliyon; 2022 Aug; 8(8):e10038. PubMed ID: 36033282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A dataset on corporate sustainability disclosure.
    Tian J; Cheng Q; Xue R; Han Y; Shan Y
    Sci Data; 2023 Mar; 10(1):182. PubMed ID: 37002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding the Green Development Behavior and Performance of Industrial Enterprises (GDBP-IE): Scale Development and Validation.
    Li X; Du J; Long H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32151073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Structural model of corporate social responsibility. An empirical study on Mexican SMEs.
    Ríos-Manríquez M; Ferrer-Ríos MG; Sánchez-Fernández MD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246384. PubMed ID: 33592072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Strengthening the role of corporate social responsibility in the dimensions of sustainable village economic development.
    Ayu Purnamawati IG; Yuniarta GA; Jie F
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15115. PubMed ID: 37095962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Sustainable Innovation: A Case in China's Heavy Pollution Industry.
    Yan R; Li X; Zhu X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():946570. PubMed ID: 35859842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are corporate environmental activities to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs) simply greenwashing? An empirical study of environmental management control systems in Vietnamese companies from the stakeholder management perspective.
    Nishitani K; Nguyen TBH; Trinh TQ; Wu Q; Kokubu K
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113364. PubMed ID: 34399553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Environmental sustainability for traditional energy small and medium enterprises.
    Karaeva A; Ionescu G; Cioca LI; Tolkou A; Katsoyiannis I; Kyzas G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47822-47831. PubMed ID: 36749510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling the Significance of Sustainability Orientation on the Sustainability Performance of Micro-Enterprises in an Emerging Economy.
    Wan Mustapa WNB; Hayat N; Fazal SA; Al Mamun A; Salameh AA; Zainol NR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():881086. PubMed ID: 35664183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An analytical study of employee loyalty and corporate culture satisfaction assessment based on sentiment analysis.
    Xie J; Su RLG; Song J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():971569. PubMed ID: 36389518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research on the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and green innovative behavior: the moderating effect of moral identity.
    Rongbin R; Wan C; Zuping Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):52189-52203. PubMed ID: 35260982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How Can Agricultural Corporate Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Green Intellectual Capital? A New Environmental Management Approach to Green Agriculture.
    Pan C; Jiang Y; Wang M; Xu S; Xu M; Dong Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Creating corporate advantage.
    Collis DJ; Montgomery CA
    Harv Bus Rev; 1998; 76(3):70-83. PubMed ID: 10179655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability?
    Ludwig P; Sassen R
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113780. PubMed ID: 34607134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cultural inclusion and corporate sustainability: evidence from food culture and corporate total factor productivity in China.
    Sun G; Lin X; Chen J; Xu N; Xiong P; Li H
    Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 2023; 10(1):159. PubMed ID: 37063392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the "Tian-Ren-He-Yi" Belief System Promote Corporate Environmental Performance?
    Lai J; Liu B; Wang H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():886114. PubMed ID: 35519634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of public infrastructure project delays on sustainable community development.
    Hussain S; Shahzad M; Appolloni A; Xuetong W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40519-40533. PubMed ID: 36622583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.