168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36092049)
1. What are the consequences of ignoring cross-loadings in bifactor models? A simulation study assessing parameter recovery and sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices.
Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Castañeda R
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():923877. PubMed ID: 36092049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.
Shi D; DiStefano C; Maydeu-Olivares A; Lee T
Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):179-207. PubMed ID: 33576257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions.
Groskurth K; Bluemke M; Lechner CM
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3891-3914. PubMed ID: 37640961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit.
Gegenfurtner A
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1037111. PubMed ID: 36389589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.
Greene AL; Eaton NR; Li K; Forbes MK; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Waldman ID; Cicero DC; Conway CC; Docherty AR; Fried EI; Ivanova MY; Jonas KG; Latzman RD; Patrick CJ; Reininghaus U; Tackett JL; Wright AGC; Kotov R
J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Oct; 128(7):740-764. PubMed ID: 31318246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.
McNeish D; Wolf MG
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1157-1174. PubMed ID: 35585278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Fake Perturbation of Ordinal Data: A Sample by Replacement Approach.
Lombardi L; Pastore M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Jul; 47(4):519-46. PubMed ID: 26777668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices: A Monte Carlo Study.
Hsu HY; Kwok OM; Lin JH; Acosta S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 26609878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pandemic Stressor Scale: factorial validity and reliability of a measure of stressors during a pandemic.
Lotzin A; Ketelsen R; Zrnic I; Lueger-Schuster B; Böttche M; Schäfer I
BMC Psychol; 2022 Apr; 10(1):92. PubMed ID: 35395827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small but Nontrivial: A Comparison of Six Strategies to Handle Cross-Loadings in Bifactor Predictive Models.
Zhang B; Luo J; Sun T; Cao M; Drasgow F
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):115-132. PubMed ID: 34357822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A study of the psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of Obsessive Thoughts Checklist (OTC) with confirmatory factor analysis].
Smári J; Thor Olason D
Encephale; 2005; 31(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 15959441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of General Disaster Preparedness Belief Scale Based on Health Belief Model.
Inal E; Dogan N
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Dec; 33(6):627-636. PubMed ID: 30415647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bifactor Structure for the Categorical Chinese Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
Xu M; Leung SO
Span J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 19():E67. PubMed ID: 27724991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the fitting propensity of factor models.
Bader M; Moshagen M
Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36201821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.
Montoya AK; Edwards MC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):413-440. PubMed ID: 33994558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Inventory of Personality Organization-Reality Testing Subscale.
Dagnall N; Denovan A; Parker A; Drinkwater K; Walsh RS
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1116. PubMed ID: 30026714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.
Shi D; Lee T; Maydeu-Olivares A
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):310-334. PubMed ID: 30911195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment.
Lubbe D
Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):413-433. PubMed ID: 37071271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No probifactor model fit index bias, but a propensity toward selecting the best model.
Bader M; Moshagen M
J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 Aug; 131(6):689-695. PubMed ID: 35901396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
