These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36092066)
1. Assortative mate preferences for height across short-term and long-term relationship contexts in a cross-cultural sample. Pisanski K; Fernandez-Alonso M; Díaz-Simón N; Oleszkiewicz A; Sardinas A; Pellegrino R; Estevez N; Mora EC; Luckett CR; Feinberg DR Front Psychol; 2022; 13():937146. PubMed ID: 36092066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict. Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human height preferences as a function of population size in the Cook Islands and Norway. Sorokowski P; Oleszkiewicz A; Sorokowska A; Pisanski K Am J Hum Biol; 2020 May; 32(3):e23367. PubMed ID: 31793702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences. Courtiol A; Raymond M; Godelle B; Ferdy JB Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2189-203. PubMed ID: 20199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans. Lidborg LH; Cross CP; Boothroyd LG Elife; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35179485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships. Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role. Valentova JV; Stulp G; Třebický V; Havlíček J PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86534. PubMed ID: 24466136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No evidence for size-assortative mating in the wild despite mutual mate choice in sex-role-reversed pipefishes. Mobley KB; Abou Chakra M; Jones AG Ecol Evol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 24455162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity? Fisher CI; Fincher CL; Hahn AC; Little AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 24168811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-linear associations between stature and mate choice characteristics for American men and their spouses. Stulp G; Mills M; Pollet TV; Barrett L Am J Hum Biol; 2014; 26(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 24817592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior. Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assortative mating for human height: A meta-analysis. Stulp G; Simons MJ; Grasman S; Pollet TV Am J Hum Biol; 2017 Jan; 29(1):. PubMed ID: 27637175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals. Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test. Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study. Zhao Z; Su W; Hou J BMC Psychol; 2023 Dec; 11(1):444. PubMed ID: 38111064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Pawłowski B Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Apr; 270(1516):709-12. PubMed ID: 12713744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity. O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assortative mating and mate-choice contributes to the maintenance of a developmental dimorphism in Streblospio benedicti. Ruskie EL; Zakas C J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2023 Sep; 340(6):424-430. PubMed ID: 37158462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]