These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36093494)

  • 1. A Victim-Based Framework for Telecom Fraud Analysis: A Bayesian Network Model.
    Ni P; Yu W
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():7937355. PubMed ID: 36093494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Framework for Analyzing Fraud Risk Warning and Interference Effects by Fusing Multivariate Heterogeneous Data: A Bayesian Belief Network.
    Hu M; Li X; Li M; Zhu R; Si B
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jun; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 37372236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generative adversarial network based telecom fraud detection at the receiving bank.
    Zheng YJ; Zhou XH; Sheng WG; Xue Y; Chen SY
    Neural Netw; 2018 Jun; 102():78-86. PubMed ID: 29558653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communicating telecom fraud risk in anti-telefraud messages: The effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes.
    Liu M; Chen J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1093933. PubMed ID: 36726509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the individual: An improved telecom fraud detection approach based on latent synergy graph learning.
    Wu J; Hu R; Li D; Ren L; Huang Z; Zang Y
    Neural Netw; 2024 Jan; 169():20-31. PubMed ID: 37857170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental States: A Key Point in Scam Compliance and Warning Compliance in Real Life.
    Wen X; Xu L; Wang J; Gao Y; Shi J; Zhao K; Tao F; Qian X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scenario-Entity Analysis based on an entity-relationship model: Revisiting crime reconstruction.
    Wang L; Jia M; Peng C; Ni S; Shen S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109923. PubMed ID: 31437758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychosocial characteristics of victims of special fraud among Japanese older adults: A cross-sectional study using scam vulnerability scale.
    Ueno D; Arakawa M; Fujii Y; Amano S; Kato Y; Matsuoka T; Narumoto J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():960442. PubMed ID: 35959011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Financial Fraud against Older People in Hong Kong: Assessing and Predicting the Fear and Perceived Risk of Victimization.
    Li JCM; Wong GTW; Manning M; Yeung DY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making the most of cybercrime and fraud crime report data: a case study of UK Action Fraud.
    Correia SG
    Int J Popul Data Sci; 2022; 7(1):1721. PubMed ID: 35719715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applications of Bayesian Neural Networks in Outlier Detection.
    Tao C
    Big Data; 2023 Oct; 11(5):369-386. PubMed ID: 36706252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "This Is What We Don't Know": Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment.
    Sahlin U; Helle I; Perepolkin D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 33151017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In their own words: deception detection by victims and near victims of fraud.
    Junger M; Koning L; Hartel P; Veldkamp B
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1135369. PubMed ID: 37251040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A holistic approach to food safety risks: Food fraud as an example.
    Marvin HJP; Bouzembrak Y; Janssen EM; van der Fels-Klerx HJ; van Asselt ED; Kleter GA
    Food Res Int; 2016 Nov; 89(Pt 1):463-470. PubMed ID: 28460939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding and Preventing Financial Fraud Against Older Citizens in Chinese Society: Results of a Focus Group Study.
    Li JC; Yu Yolanda M; Wong GT; Ngan RM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2016 Oct; 60(13):1509-31. PubMed ID: 25891271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian network models for medical decision support.
    Constantinou AC; Fenton N; Marsh W; Radlinski L
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Feb; 67():75-93. PubMed ID: 26830286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election.
    Botvinik-Nezer R; Jones M; Wager TD
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jul; 7(7):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 37037989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Victims, offenders and victim-offender overlaps of knife crime: A social network analysis approach using police records.
    Bailey L; Harinam V; Ariel B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242621. PubMed ID: 33306696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TFD-IIS-CRMCB: Telecom Fraud Detection for Incomplete Information Systems Based on Correlated Relation and Maximal Consistent Block.
    Li R; Chen H; Liu S; Wang K; Wang B; Hu X
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is a capable guardian to older fraud victims? Comparison of younger and older victims' characteristics of online fraud utilizing routine activity theory.
    Parti K
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1118741. PubMed ID: 37351434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.