These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3609376)

  • 1. [Appreciation of approaching and departing sources of natural acoustic signals].
    Kozhevnikova EV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1987 Apr; 73(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 3609376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues.
    Bach DR; Neuhoff JG; Perrig W; Seifritz E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19615414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Auditory motion aftereffects with approaching and withdrawing sound sources].
    Andreeva IG; Malinina ES
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2010; 36(3):48-54. PubMed ID: 20586302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral loudness summation for sequences of short noise bursts.
    Verhey JL; Uhlemann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):925-34. PubMed ID: 18247895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Velocity discrimination of auditory image moving in vertical plane.
    Agaeva M
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 15567597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response scatter in measuring changing-loudness aftereffects: evidence for simplified processing of auditory motion-in-depth and potential collision.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Oct; 134(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 18183741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural cross-correlation and signal decorrelation: insights into coding of auditory space.
    Saberi K; Petrosyan A
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jul; 235(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15833312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embodied auditory perception: the emotional impact of approaching and receding sound sources.
    Tajadura-Jiménez A; Väljamäe A; Asutay E; Västfjäll D
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):216-29. PubMed ID: 20364898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Echo thresholds of the precedence effect in the vertical plane].
    Agaeva MIu
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 18825942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Inertial processes in the auditory system during localization of moving sound sources].
    Al'tman IaA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 18689242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: an ERP mapping study.
    Ducommun CY; Murray MM; Thut G; Bellmann A; Viaud-Delmon I; Clarke S; Michel CM
    Neuroimage; 2002 May; 16(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 11969319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using beamforming and binaural synthesis for the psychoacoustical evaluation of target sources in noise.
    Song W; Ellermeier W; Hald J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):910-24. PubMed ID: 18247894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Velocity perception for sounds moving in frequency space.
    Henry MJ; McAuley JD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):172-88. PubMed ID: 21258918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual influences on the perception of visual apparent motion: exploring the effect of a single sound.
    Bruns P; Getzmann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 18790468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of acoustic stimulation parameters on human appreciation of changes in distance from a sound source].
    Vartanian IA; Chernigovskaia TV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1980 Jan; 66(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 7364098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Discrimination of signals simulating movement of a sound source by dogs after ablation of the auditory cortex].
    Baru AV; Kalmykova IV; Shmigidina GN
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(5):842-8. PubMed ID: 4072400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.