These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3609425)

  • 1. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean section; changing patterns in Saudi Arabia.
    Chattopadhyay SK; Sengupta PB; Edrees YB; Lambourne A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Oct; 25(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 2889633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 2804827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caesarean section dissected, 1978-1983.
    Yudkin PL; Redman CW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 93(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 3947589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Indications for cesarean section].
    Stoll W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-year period (1997-2012).
    Lurie S; Shalev A; Sadan O; Golan A
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 27590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.
    Sehgal NN
    J Community Health; 1981; 7(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7320229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital.
    Tampakoudis P; Assimakopoulos E; Grimbizis G; Zafrakas M; Tampakoudis G; Mantalenakis S; Bontis J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 15672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S; Fabia J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the number of cesarean sections be reduced without risk? An analysis of rates and indications in a university clinic.
    Poisson-Salomon AS; Breart G; Maillard F; Rabarison Y; Chavigny C; Sureau C; Rumeau-Rouquette C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1986 Sep; 22(5-6):297-307. PubMed ID: 3770279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.
    Hughey MJ; LaPata RE; McElin TW; Lussky R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 850561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.