186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36094860)
1. Differential transcriptome profile underlying risky choice in a rat gambling task.
Kwak MJ; Kim WY; Jung SH; Chung YJ; Kim JH
J Behav Addict; 2022 Sep; 11(3):845-857. PubMed ID: 36094860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.
Barrus MM; Winstanley CA
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):785-94. PubMed ID: 26791209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction.
Ferland JN; Hynes TJ; Hounjet CD; Lindenbach D; Vonder Haar C; Adams WK; Phillips AG; Winstanley CA
J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 39(10):1842-1854. PubMed ID: 30626700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative insensitivity to time-out punishments induced by win-paired cues in a rat gambling task.
Langdon AJ; Hathaway BA; Zorowitz S; Harris CBW; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2543-2556. PubMed ID: 31256220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impulsive Action and Impulsive Choice Are Differentially Expressed in Rats Depending on the Age at Exposure to a Gambling Task.
Cho BR; Kwak MJ; Kim WY; Kim JH
Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():503. PubMed ID: 30386266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.
Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Schulzer M; Shafiee M; Kingstone A; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA
J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10362-10370. PubMed ID: 30373765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction between trait and housing condition produces differential decision-making toward risk choice in a rat gambling task.
Kim WY; Cho BR; Kwak MJ; Kim JH
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5718. PubMed ID: 28720904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential effects of environmental enrichment, social-housing, and isolation-rearing on a rat gambling task: dissociations between impulsive action and risky decision-making.
Zeeb FD; Wong AC; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Jan; 225(2):381-95. PubMed ID: 22864967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. D
Mortazavi L; Hynes TJ; Chernoff CS; Ramaiah S; Brodie HG; Russell B; Hathaway BA; Kaur S; Winstanley CA
J Neurosci; 2023 Feb; 43(6):979-992. PubMed ID: 36623876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lesions of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex differentially affect acquisition and performance of a rodent gambling task.
Zeeb FD; Winstanley CA
J Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 31(6):2197-204. PubMed ID: 21307256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential Involvement of the Agranular vs Granular Insular Cortex in the Acquisition and Performance of Choice Behavior in a Rodent Gambling Task.
Pushparaj A; Kim AS; Musiol M; Zangen A; Daskalakis ZJ; Zack M; Winstanley CA; Le Foll B
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2015 Nov; 40(12):2832-42. PubMed ID: 25953358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serotonin 2C Antagonism in the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex Ameliorates Cue-Enhanced Risk Preference and Restores Sensitivity to Reinforcer Devaluation in Male Rats.
Hathaway BA; Schumacher JD; Hrelja KM; Winstanley CA
eNeuro; 2021; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 34815296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of disrupting medial prefrontal cortex GABA transmission on decision-making in a rodent gambling task.
Paine TA; O'Hara A; Plaut B; Lowes DC
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 May; 232(10):1755-65. PubMed ID: 25420610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT
Adams WK; Barkus C; Ferland JN; Sharp T; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Oct; 234(20):3091-3104. PubMed ID: 28733811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kindling of the basolateral or central nucleus of the amygdala increases suboptimal choice in a rat gambling task and increases motor impulsivity in risk-preferring animals.
Tremblay M; Adams WK; Winstanley CA
Behav Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 398():112941. PubMed ID: 32991928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task.
Zeeb FD; Baarendse PJ; Vanderschuren LJ; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Dec; 232(24):4481-91. PubMed ID: 26387517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scopolamine and amphetamine produce similar decision-making deficits on a rat gambling task via independent pathways.
Silveira MM; Malcolm E; Shoaib M; Winstanley CA
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():86-95. PubMed ID: 25529186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacological evidence of a cholinergic contribution to elevated impulsivity and risky decision-making caused by adding win-paired cues to a rat gambling task.
Betts GD; Hynes TJ; Winstanley CA
J Psychopharmacol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):701-712. PubMed ID: 33573446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sign tracking predicts suboptimal behavior in a rodent gambling task.
Swintosky M; Brennan JT; Koziel C; Paulus JP; Morrison SE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Sep; 238(9):2645-2660. PubMed ID: 34191111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Affective and cognitive mechanisms of risky decision making.
Shimp KG; Mitchell MR; Beas BS; Bizon JL; Setlow B
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Jan; 117():60-70. PubMed ID: 24642448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
